[IDEM libro primo definitionum. ] §27.3.21.prCum pupillus tutelae actione contra tutorem alterum tutori, quem iudex in solidum condemnauit, cessit, quamuis postea iudicatum fiat, tamen actio data non intercidit, quia pro parte condemnati tutoris non tutela reddita, sed nominis pretium solutum uidetur.
[THE SAME, Definitions, Book 1] When a ward has assigned to one guardian, whom the judge condemned in solidum, the action of guardianship against the other guardian, even if the judgment is afterwards satisfied, the action granted nevertheless does not perish, because, in respect of the share of the condemned guardian, it is not deemed that the guardianship has been restored, but that the price of the claim has been paid.