[ULPIANUS libro trigesimo quinto ad edictum. ] §27.3.13.prSi tutor post pubertatem pupilli negotia administrauerit, in iudicium tutelae ueniet id tantum, sine quo administratio tutelae expediri non potest: si uero post pubertatem pupilli is qui tutor eius fuerat fundos eius uendiderit, mancipia et praedia comparauerit, neque uenditionis huius neque emptionis ratio iudicio tutelae continebitur.
[ULPIANUS in his thirty-fifth book On the Edict] If a guardian has managed affairs after the puberty of the ward, only that without which the administration of the guardianship cannot be settled will come into the judgment of guardianship. But if, after the puberty of the ward, he who had been his guardian has sold his lands, or purchased slaves and estates, the accounting of neither this sale nor purchase will be included in the judgment of guardianship.
et est uerum ea quae conexa sunt uenire in tutelae actionem: sed et illud est uerum, si coeperit negotia administrare post tutelam finitam, deuolui iudicium tutelae in negotiorum gestorum actionem: oportuit enim eum a semet ipso tutelam exigere.
And it is true that those things which are connected come into the action of guardianship; but it is also true that, if he has begun to manage affairs after the end of the guardianship, the judgment of guardianship is transferred to the action for management of affairs; for he ought to have demanded the accounting of the guardianship from himself.
sed et si quis, cum tutelam administrasset, idem curator adulescenti fuerit datus, dicendum est negotiorum gestorum eum conueniri posse.
But also, if anyone, after having administered a guardianship, has been appointed curator to the same young man, it must be said that he can be sued by the action for management of affairs.