[IDEM libro uicesimo tertio quaestionum. ]
[THE SAME, from the twenty-third book of Questions.]\n\nBut what if he has not excused himself, but has refused to administer, content with the fact that the others were suitable?
§27.1.35.prQuid autem, si se non excusauerit, sed administrare noluerit contentus, quod ceteri idonei essent? hic poterit conueniri, si ab illis res seruari non potuisset.
This man can be sued if the property could not have been preserved by them.
sed hoc non quaerendum est, sed contumacia punienda est eius, qui quodammodo se excusauit.
But this is not what should be inquired into, but the contumacy of him who in a way excused himself must be punished.
multo magis quis dicere debebit indignum iudicio patris, qui ut suspectus remotus est a tutela.
Much more will one have to say that he who has been removed from guardianship as suspect is unworthy of the father's judgment.