[PAPINIANUS libro quarto responsorum. ] §26.2.26.prIure nostro tutela communium liberorum matri testamento patris frustra mandatur, nec, si prouinciae praeses imperitia lapsus patris uoluntatem sequendam decreuerit, successor eius sententiam, quam leges nostrae non admittunt, recte sequetur.
[PAPINIANUS, from the fourth book of Opinions.] According to our law, the tutelage of common children is entrusted to the mother by the father's will in vain; nor, if the governor of a province, having erred through ignorance, decrees that the father's will must be followed, will his successor rightly follow a decision which our laws do not allow.
§26.2.26.1Honoris causa tutor datus non uidetur, quem pater a ceteris tutoribus, quibus negotia gerenda mandauit, rationes accipere uoluit.
A person whom the father wished to receive accounts from the other tutors, to whom he entrusted the administration of affairs, is not regarded as a tutor appointed for the sake of honor.
§26.2.26.2Propter litem inofficiosi testamenti ordinandam exheredato filio, cui tutorem pater dedit, eundem a praetore confirmari oportet: euentus iudicatae rei declarabit, utrum ex testamento patris an ex decreto praetoris auctoritatem acceperit.
For the purpose of arranging a lawsuit regarding an inofficious testament, for a disinherited son to whom the father gave a tutor, the same tutor must be confirmed by the praetor; the outcome of the adjudicated matter will declare whether he received his authority from the father's will or from the praetor's decree.