[PAULUS libro octauo ad Sabinum. ] §26.1.4.prQuod dicitur, si indistincte datus sit curator, in totam litem datum uideri, fortasse eo spectet, si familiae herciscundae aut communi diuidundo aut finium regundorum actio esset cum tutore, et si indistincte datus esset, non solum eo nomine curator esset, quod ageret pupillus pupillaue, sed inuicem quoque quod cum his ageretur.
[PAULUS, On Sabinus, Book 8.] What is said, that if a curator is given without distinction, he is considered given for the whole lawsuit, perhaps refers to this: if there were an action for division of an inheritance, or for division of common property, or for regulation of boundaries, with a guardian, and if he were given without distinction, he would be curator not only on that account, that the male or female ward is suing, but also conversely, that a suit is being brought against them.
§26.1.4.1Possunt autem uel plures in plurium locum uel unus in plurium uel unus unius loco uel in unam litem uel in plures curator peti.
Furthermore, curators can be requested, either several in the place of several, or one in the place of several, or one in the place of one, or for one lawsuit, or for several.