[SCAEUOLA libro nono decimo quaestionum. ] §24.3.47.prCum mulier uiri lenocinio adulterata fuerit, nihil ex dote retinetur: cur enim improbet maritus mores, quos ipse aut ante corrupit aut postea probauit? si tamen ex mente legis sumet quis, ut nec accusare possit, qui lenocinium uxori praebuerit, audiendus est.
[SCAEVOLA, Book 19 of Questions.] When a wife has committed adultery through the pandering of her husband, nothing is retained from the dowry; for why should a husband disapprove of morals which he himself either corrupted beforehand or approved of afterwards? If, however, anyone should assume from the spirit of the law that he who has provided pandering for his wife cannot even accuse her, he ought to be heard.