[MARCELLUS libro singulari responsorum. ] §24.3.38.prLucius Titius cum esset filius familias, uoluntate patris uxorem Maeuiam duxit et dotem pater accepit: Maeuia Titio repudium misit: postea pater repudiati absente filio sponsalia cum ea de nomine filii sui fecit: Maeuia deinde repudium sponsalibus misit atque ita alii nupsit.
[MARCELLUS, Single Book of Responses.] When Lucius Titius was a filius familias, he married Maevia with his father's consent, and the father received the dowry. Maevia sent a notice of divorce to Titius. Afterwards, the father of the divorced man, in the absence of his son, contracted a betrothal with her in the name of his son. Maevia then sent a notice of repudiation of the betrothal and thus married another.
quaero, si Maeuia aget cum Lucio Titio quondam marito et a patre herede relicto de dote et probetur culpa mulieris matrimonium dissolutum, an possit maritus propter culpam mulieris dotem retinere.
I ask, if Maevia sues Lucius Titius, her former husband who was left as heir by his father, for the dowry, and it is proved that the marriage was dissolved through the fault of the woman, whether the husband can retain the dowry on account of the fault of the woman.
Marcellus respondit, etiamsi ut heres institutus a patre Titius conueniretur, tamen, si sponsalibus non consensisset, culpam mulieris multandam esse.
Marcellus replied that, even if Titius were sued as the heir appointed by his father, nevertheless, if he had not consented to the betrothal, the fault of the woman ought to be penalized.