[IDEM libro tertio disputationum. ] §24.3.29.prQuotiens pater dotem dat et stipulatur, ita demum in suam personam de dote actionem transfert, si ex continenti stipuletur: ceterum si interposito tempore stipulari uelit, non nisi consentiente filia poterit, quamuis in potestate sit, quia deteriorem condicionem in dote filiae facere non potest nisi consentiat.
[THE SAME, Book 3 of the Disputations.] Whenever a father gives a dowry and stipulates for its return, he transfers the action concerning the dowry to his own person only if he stipulates immediately; but if he wishes to stipulate after an interval of time, he can do so only with the consent of his daughter, even though she is under his paternal power, because he cannot make the condition of his daughter's dowry worse unless she consents.
plane si ante nuptias dotem dederit, poterit ex interuallo, ante nuptias tamen, et citra uoluntatem quoque filiae stipulari.
Obviously, if he has given the dowry before the marriage, he will be able to stipulate after an interval, provided it is still before the marriage, and even without the consent of his daughter.
§24.3.29.1Si quis pro muliere dotem dederit conueneritque, ut quoquo modo dirempto matrimonio ipsi solueretur, postea maritus uxori dotem soluerit, rectissime dicetur exactionem nihilo minus ei qui dedit contra maritum competere.
If someone has given a dowry on behalf of a woman and agreed that, in whatever manner the marriage is dissolved, it should be paid to himself, and afterwards the husband has paid the dowry to the wife, it will be most correctly said that the right of action nonetheless belongs to the one who gave it against the husband.