[PAULUS libro septimo responsorum. ] §24.1.57.prEa, quae a marito suo pecuniam ex causa donationis acceperat, litteras ad eum misit huiusmodi: 'cum petenti mihi a te, domine carissime, adnuerit indulgentia tua uiginti ad expediendas quasdam res meas, quae summa mihi numerata est sub ea condicione, ut, si per me meosque mores quid steterit, quo minus in diem uitae nostrae matrimonium permaneat, siue inuito te discessero de domo tua uel repudium tibi sine ulla querella misero diuortiumque factum per me probabitur, tunc uiginti, quae mihi hac die donationis causa dare uoluisti, daturam restituturam me sine ulla dilatione: spondeo'.
[PAULUS, in the seventh book of Opinions.] A woman who had received money from her husband by way of donation sent a letter to him of the following import: "Since, most beloved master, upon my requesting it from you, your indulgence has granted twenty to settle certain of my affairs, which sum was paid to me under this condition, that, if any obstacle should arise through me and my conduct to prevent the marriage from continuing to the end of our lives, or if I should leave your house against your will, or send a divorce notice to you without any complaint, and the divorce is proved to have been effected through me, then I promise that I will give and restore without any delay the twenty which you wished to give to me on this day by way of donation." I ask whether, if this same woman should send a divorce notice to her husband Titius, she ought to restore the money.
quaero, an, si eadem Titio marito suo repudium miserit, pecuniam restituere debeat. Paulus respondit pecuniam, quam uir uxori donauit, ex stipulatione proposita, si condicio eius exstitit, peti posse, quoniam ex donatione in pecuniam creditam conuersa est: quod si stipulatio commissa non probetur, tunc tantum peti posse, quanto locupletior ex ea donatione facta probetur.
Paulus answered that the money which the husband donated to his wife can be claimed on the basis of the propounded stipulation if its condition has been fulfilled, because it has been converted from a donation into a loan. But if the forfeit of the stipulation is not proved, then it can be claimed only to the extent that she is proved to have been made richer by that donation.