[PAULUS libro quinto quaestionum. ] §23.5.10.prErit ergo potestas legis ambulatoria, quia dotalis fuit obligatio.
[PAULUS, Questions, Book V.] Therefore, the power of the law will be ambulatory, because it was the obligation that was dotal.
numquid ergo etiam illo nondum redempto alterum quoque alienare possit, quia potest alterum redimere? an hoc non debet recipi, ut nullus in dote sit? certe ex post facto uidebitur recte alienatus illo postea redempto.
Would he, then, even before that former land is bought back, also be able to alienate the other, because he is able to buy back the former? Or should this not be accepted, so that nothing remains in the dowry? Certainly, from a post-facto perspective, the other will be deemed to have been rightly alienated if the former is subsequently bought back.