[PROCULUS libro quinto epistularum. ] §23.3.82.prCum uxor uirum suum quam pecuniam sibi deberet in dotem filiae communis dare iusserit et id fecisse dicatur, puto animaduertendum esse, utrum eam dotem suo an uxoris nomine dedit: si suo, nihilo minus uxori eum debere pecuniam: si uxoris nomine dederit, ipsum ab uxore liberatum esse.
[PROCULUS in the fifth book of Epistles.] When a wife has ordered her husband to give the money which he owed her as a dowry for their common daughter, and he is said to have done so, I think it should be observed whether he gave that dowry in his own name or in the name of his wife: if in his own, he nonetheless owes the money to his wife; if he gave it in the name of his wife, he himself is released from his obligation to his wife.