[CALLISTRATUS libro secundo quaestionum. ] §23.2.64.prLibertum eundemque tutorem pupillae eo, quod in matrimonium collocata ipsi tutori suo uel filio eius est, senatus relegandum censuit.
[CALLISTRATUS, in the Second Book of Questions.] The senate decreed that a freedman who is at the same time the tutor of a female ward should be relegated, for the reason that she was given in marriage to her tutor himself or to his son.
§23.2.64.1Senatus consulti, quo prohibentur tutores et filii eorum pupillas suas ducere, puto heredem quoque tutoris extraneum sententia adprehendi, cum ideo prohibuerit huiusmodi nuptias, ne pupillae in re familiari circumscribantur ab his, qui rationes eis gestae tutelae reddere compelluntur.
I think that an outside heir of the tutor is also included within the scope of the senatusconsultum by which tutors and their sons are prohibited from marrying their female wards, since it prohibited marriages of this kind for this reason: lest female wards be defrauded in their property by those who are compelled to render to them accounts of the administered guardianship.
§23.2.64.2Tutor autem pupilli non prohibetur filiam suam collocare pupillo suo in matrimonium.
A tutor of a male ward, however, is not prohibited from giving his daughter in marriage to his ward.