[PAPINIANUS libro uicesimo quaestionum. ] §22.3.26.prProcula magnae quantitatis fideicommissum a fratre sibi debitum post mortem eius in ratione cum heredibus compensare uellet, ex diuerso autem allegaretur numquam id a fratre quamdiu uixit desideratum, cum uariis ex causis saepe rationi fratris pecunias ratio Proculae soluisset: diuus Commodus cum super eo negotio cognosceret, non admisit compensationem, quasi tacite fratri fideicommissum fuisset remissum.
[PAPINIANUS libro uicesimo quaestionum.] When Procula wished to set off in an account with the heirs, after his death, a trust of a large amount due to her from her brother, but on the other hand it was alleged that this had never been demanded from the brother as long as he lived, although the account of Procula had often paid money to the account of the brother for various reasons: the Divine Commodus, when he investigated the matter, did not allow the set-off, as if the trust had been tacitly remitted to the brother.