Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §21.2.2.pr

Judgment for Double Value on Eviction Without Stipulation

Passage 3083 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

On the condemnation of the defendant to pay double the price when an explicit promise of double security was not made but an action is brought on that ground.

[PAULUS libro quinto ad Sabinum. ] §21.2.2.prSi dupla non promitteretur et eo nomine agetur, dupli condemnandus est reus.
[PAULUS, on Sabinus, book five.] If double the price was not promised, and an action is brought on that account, the defendant must be condemned to pay double.

Notes

  1. 21.2.2.prSi dupla non promitteretur et eo nomine agetur — The imperfect subjunctive promitteretur refers to the past fact or assumption that double was not promised at the time of the sale, whereas the future indicative agetur and the apodosis condemnandus est (expressing future obligation) address the potential future event of an action being brought, resulting in a mixed conditional structure.
  2. 21.2.2.preo nomine — Literally 'under that name' or 'on that account,' referring here to bringing an action based on the seller's liability for eviction arising from the good faith of the contract (such as the actio empti), even in the absence of an express stipulation for double the price.
  3. 21.2.2.prdupli — This is a genitive of penalty used with the verb condemnandus est (condemnare) to indicate the amount or penalty to which the defendant is condemned.

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §21.2.2.pr. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:21.2.2.pr

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.