[IDEM libro secundo de omnibus tribunalibus. ] §2.1.15.prSi per errorem alius pro alio praetor fuerit aditus, nihil ualebit quod actum est.
[THE SAME, on All Tribunals, Book II.] If, through error, one praetor has been approached instead of another, what has been done will be of no validity.
nec enim ferendus est qui dicat consensisse eos in praesidem, cum, ut Iulianus scribit, non consentiant qui errent: quid enim tam contrarium consensui est quam error, qui imperitiam detegit?
For anyone who says that they agreed to the governor as judge is not to be tolerated, since, as Julian writes, those who err do not consent. For what is so contrary to consent as error, which reveals ignorance?