[LABEO libro quarto posteriorum epitomatorum a Iauoleno. ] §19.2.28.prQuod si domi habitatione conductor aeque usus fuisset, §19.2.28.1praestaturum etiam eius domus mercedem, quae uitium fecisset, deberi putat.
[LABEO, Epitomes of the Posthumous Works by Iavolenus, book 4] But if the tenant had equally used the habitation of the house, he thinks that [the tenant] would pay the rent even for that house which had developed a defect, [and] that it is owed.
§19.2.28.2Idem iuris esse, si potestatem conducendi habebat, uti pretium conductionis praestaret.
The same rule of law applies, if he had the opportunity of renting [another house], so that he should pay the price of the lease.
sed si locator conductori potestatem conducendae domus non fecisset et is in qua habitaret conduxisset, tantum ei praestandum putat, quantum sine dolo malo praestitisset.
But if the landlord had not given the tenant the opportunity of renting a house, and the latter had rented one in which to live, he thinks that so much must be paid to him as he would have paid without bad faith.
ceterum si gratuitam habitationem habuisset, pro portione temporis ex locatione domus deducendum esse.
On the other hand, if he had a gratuitous habitation, a deduction must be made from the lease of the house in proportion to the time.