Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §18.4.25.pr
Duty to Transfer Benefits from Excluded Land in Estate Sale
Summary
Presents the opinions of Labeo and Paulus regarding the ownership of benefits acquired by the seller in connection with a specific plot of land that was excluded from the sale of an inheritance. Labeo asserts the seller's duty to deliver it to the buyer, while Paulus argues that the parties' agreement is the primary standard, defaulting to delivery if the agreement is unclear.
Notes
- §18.4.25.prueniit — A perfect third-person singular form of the verb *ueneo* ("to be sold"), representing *uēniit*. It should not be confused with the present tense of the same verb (*uĕnit*) or the perfect of *uĕnio* ("to come", *uēnit*).
- §18.4.25.prquid actum fuerit — An indirect question clause using the perfect passive subjunctive of *ago*. In Roman legal texts, *quid actum sit/fuerit* refers specifically to "what was agreed upon" or "what the parties intended," rather than merely "what was done."
- §18.4.25.prnon secus ac si — An idiomatic comparative expression meaning "just as if" or "not otherwise than if." It introduces a counterfactual conditional clause, followed by the pluperfect subjunctive *non excepisset*.
Cite this passage
Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §18.4.25.pr. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:18.4.25.pr
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.