Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §18.4.18.pr

Recourse Against Buyer for Debt Paid Before Sale of Share

Passage 2716 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

Julian discusses a case where one co-heir pays a penalized testamentary debt before others accept, sells his share, and cannot recover from insolvent co-heirs, concluding he can sue the buyer, as such expenses are clear liabilities meant to be balanced in partition actions.

[IULIANUS libro quinto decimo digestorum. ] §18.4.18.prSi ex pluribus heredibus unus, antequam ceteri adirent hereditatem, pecuniam, quae sub poena debebatur a testatore, omnem soluerit et hereditatem uendiderit nec a coheredibus suis propter egestatem eorum quicquam seruare poterit, cum emptore hereditatis uel ex stipulatu uel ex uendito recte experietur: omnem enim pecuniam hereditario nomine datam eo manifestius est, quod in iudicio familiae herciscundae deducitur, per quod nihil amplius unusquisque a coheredibus suis consequi potest, quam quod tamquam heres impenderit.
[JULIAN, Digest, book 15.] one of several heirs, before the others entered upon the inheritance, paid all the money which was owed under a penalty by the testator, and sold his share of the inheritance, and because of their insolvency is unable to recover anything from his co-heirs, he will rightly bring an action against the buyer of the inheritance either on the stipulation or on the sale; for it is all the more obvious that all the money paid under the name of heir [is recoverable], because it is brought into the action for the partition of an inheritance, through which each person can obtain nothing more from his co-heirs than what he has expended as heir.

Notes

  1. §18.4.18.promnem enim pecuniam hereditario nomine datam eo manifestius est, quod... — The noun phrase 'omnem... pecuniam... datam' functions as the subject of an accusative-and-infinitive construction, where the predicate infinitive (such as 'recuperari' or 'repeti posse') is ellipted. 'eo manifestius est' accompanied by the ablative of measure of difference 'eo' and a comparative adjective, creates a correlative structure with the 'quod' clause ('it is all the more obvious because...').
  2. §18.4.18.prper quod nihil amplius unusquisque a coheredibus suis consequi potest, quam quod tamquam heres impenderit — The antecedent of the relative 'per quod' is the neuter noun 'iudicio' (referring to the 'iudicium familiae herciscundae'). In the comparative clause 'quam quod...', the verb 'impenderit' is in the subjunctive perfect (or future perfect) within a relative clause with an indefinite or hypothetical nuance.

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §18.4.18.pr. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:18.4.18.pr

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.