[IDEM libro quarto regularum. ] §18.1.45.prLabeo libro posteriorum scribit, si uestimenta interpola quis pro nouis emerit, Trebatio placere ita emptori praestandum quod interest, si ignorans interpola emerit.
[THE SAME, Rules, book 4] Labeo writes in his posthumous works that if anyone should buy refurbished garments as new, Trebatius is of the opinion that the buyer should be indemnified for his interest only if he bought the refurbished garments in ignorance.
quam sententiam et Pomponius probat, in qua et Iulianus est, qui ait, si quidem ignorabat uenditor, ipsius rei nomine teneri, si sciebat, etiam damni quod ex eo contingit: quemadmodum si uas aurichalcum pro auro uendidisset ignorans, tenetur, ut aurum quod uendidit praestet.
Pomponius also approves of this opinion, in which Julian also concurs, who says that if indeed the seller was ignorant, he is liable to the extent of the thing itself, but if he knew, he is liable also for the damage resulting therefrom; just as if someone had sold a brass vessel for gold in ignorance, he is bound to make good the gold which he sold.