[IDEM libro decimo responsorum. ] §17.1.57.prMandatum distrahendorum seruorum defuncto qui mandatum suscepit intercidisse constitit.
[THE SAME, from the tenth book of Responses.] It is established that the mandate to sell the slaves terminated upon the death of the person who undertook the mandate.
quoniam tamen heredes eius errore lapsi non animo furandi, sed exsequendi, quod defunctus suae curae fecerat, seruos uendiderant, eos ab emptoribus usucaptos uideri placuit.
Since, however, his heirs, falling into error, sold the slaves not with the intention of stealing but of executing what the deceased had made his own care, it was held that they should be seen as acquired by usucapion by the buyers.
sed uenaliciarium ex prouincia reuersum Publiciana actione non inutiliter acturum, cum exceptio iusti dominii causa cognita detur neque oporteat eum, qui certi hominis fidem elegit, ob errorem aut imperitiam heredum adfici damno.
But it was held that the slave-dealer, having returned from the province, would sue not without effect by the Publician action, since the exception of lawful ownership is granted only after an investigation of the case, and it is not proper that he who chose the trustworthiness of a specific person should suffer loss because of the error or lack of skill of the heirs.