[POMPONIUS libro tertio ex Plautio. ] §17.1.47.prIulianus ait, si fideiussori uxor doti promiserit, quod ei ex causa fideiussoria debeat, nuptiis secutis confestim mandati aduersus debitorem agere eum posse, quia intellegitur abesse ei pecunia eo, quod onera matrimonii sustineret.
[POMPONIUS, On Plautius, Book III.] Julian says that if a wife has promised her husband, who is a guarantor, as her dowry what is due to him on account of his guarantee, once the marriage has taken place, he can immediately bring an action of mandate against the debtor, because he is understood to be out of pocket by that amount because he has to bear the burdens of marriage.
§17.1.47.1Si is, qui pro te hominem dare fideiussit, alienum hominem stipulatori dederit, nec ipse liberatur nec te liberat et ideo mandati actionem tecum non habet.
If he who became a guarantor for you to deliver a slave has delivered a slave belonging to someone else to the stipulator, he himself is not released, nor does he release you, and therefore he does not have an action of mandate against you.
sed si stipulator eum hominem usuceperit, dicendum esse Iulianus ait liberationem contingere: eo ergo casu mandati actio post usucapionem demum tecum erit.
But if the stipulator has acquired the slave by usucapion, Julian says it must be held that a release occurs; therefore, in that case, the action of mandate will only lie against you after the usucapion.