[MARCELLUS libro singulari responsorum. ] §17.1.38.prLucius Titius Publio Maeuio filio naturali domum communem permisit non donationis causa creditori filii obligare: postea Maeuio defuncto relicta pupilla tutores eius iudicem aduersus Titium acceperunt et Titius de mutuis petitionibus: quaero, an domus pars, quam Titius obligandam filio suo accommodauit, arbitratu iudicis liberari debeat.
[MARCELLUS, On Responses, Single Book.] Lucius Titius permitted Publius Maevius, his natural son, to obligate (pledge) their common house to the son's creditor, not by way of gift. Afterwards, Maevius having died leaving a pupil (minor female ward), her tutors accepted a judge against Titius, and Titius [accepted a judge] regarding their mutual claims. I ask whether the part of the house which Titius allowed to be obligated for his son ought to be released by the judgment of the judge.
Marcellus respondit, an et quando debeat liberari, ex persona debitoris itemque ex eo quod inter contrahentes actum esset ac tempore, quo res de qua quaereretur obligata fuisset, iudicem aestimaturum:
Marcellus responded that whether and when it ought to be released, the judge would estimate from the person of the debtor, and likewise from what had been agreed between the contracting parties, and the time during which the property in question had been obligated.
§17.1.38.1est enim earum specierum iudicialis quaestio, per quam res expediatur, non absimilis illa, quae frequentissime agitari solet, fideiussor an et prius quam soluat agere possit, ut liberetur.
For the judicial question of these cases, through which the matter may be settled, is not unlike that which is very frequently debated: whether a surety can bring an action even before he pays, in order that he may be released.
nec tamen semper exspectandum est, ut soluat aut iudicio accepto condemnetur, si diu in solutione reus cessabit aut certe bona sua dissipabit, praesertim si domi pecuniam fideiussor non habebit, qua numerata creditori mandati actione reum conueniat.
Nor, however, must it always be expected that he should pay or be condemned after accepting a trial, if the principal debtor delays in payment for a long time or indeed dissipates his assets, especially if the surety does not have money at hand, by the payment of which to the creditor he might sue the principal debtor by an action on mandate.