Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §16.1.29.pr-16.1.29.1
Substitution of a Wife as Debtor and Evasion of the SC
Summary
Paulus rules on a case where a creditor, fearing the heirs' insolvency, contracted with the deceased's wife, deciding that the senatusconsult applies to release her and her pledges, though the praetor may reasonably grant the creditor actions against the principal debtors and the assets pledged to her. He also declares that acts devised in fraud of the senatusconsult are invalid.
Notes
- 16.1.29.prream — Feminine accusative singular of the noun reus (defendant, party). Here it does not mean 'defendant' in a lawsuit, but rather the direct 'party' or 'debtor (principal debtor)' in the contract.
- 16.1.29.prsubducta muliere — Ablative absolute consisting of the noun mulier and the perfect participle subducta ('the woman having been withdrawn'). It refers to the situation where the woman is exempted from liability by the application of the senatusconsult. The praetor, while withdrawing her from liability, provides remedial actions against the principal debtors for the creditor's protection.
- 16.1.29.1in fraudem — 'In fraud of' or 'to circumvent'. It refers to an act of evasion (fraus legi) where a legal prohibition (here, the prohibition of women's interposition under the senatusconsult) is substantially bypassed through clever indirect means while formally complying with the letter of the law.
Cite this passage
Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §16.1.29.pr-16.1.29.1. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:16.1.29.pr-16.1.29.1
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.