[PAPINIANUS libro tertio responsorum. ] §16.1.27.prBona fide personam mulieris in contrahendo secutus ob ea, quae inter uirum et uxorem accepta pecunia gesta sunt, exceptione senatus consulti non summouetur.
[PAPINIANUS, Opinions, Book 3.] A person who in contracting has in good faith relied on the credit of a woman is not barred by the exception of the senatusconsult on account of transactions that took place between husband and wife upon receipt of the money.
§16.1.27.1Cum serui ad negotiationem praepositi cum alio contrahentes personam mulieris ut idoneae sequuntur, exceptione senatus consulti dominum summouet: nec uidetur deterior causa domini per seruum fieri, sed nihil esse domino quaesitum, non magis, quam si litigiosum praedium seruus aut liberum hominem emerit.
When slaves appointed to a business, in contracting with another, rely on the credit of a woman as solvent, she bars their master by the exception of the senatusconsult; and it is not deemed that the position of the master is made worse by the slave, but rather that nothing was acquired for the master, no more than if the slave had bought litigious land or a free man.
§16.1.27.2Uxor debitricem suam uiro delegauit, ut uir creditori eius pecuniam solueret: si fidem suam pro ea quam delegauit apud uirum obligauerit, locum exceptio senatus consulti non habebit, quia mulier suum negotium gessit.
A wife delegated her female debtor to her husband so that the husband might pay money to her creditor. If she bound her own credit to her husband on behalf of the female debtor whom she delegated, the exception of the senatusconsult will have no place, because the woman conducted her own business.