[GAIUS libro nono ad edictum prouinciale. ] §15.1.10.prSi uero adhuc in suspenso est prius iudicium de peculio et ex posteriore iudicio res iudicaretur, nullo modo debet prioris iudicii ratio haberi in posteriore condemnatione, quia in actione de peculio occupantis melior est condicio, occupare autem uidetur non qui prior litem contestatus est, sed qui prior ad sententiam iudicis peruenit.
[GAIUS libro nono ad edictum prouinciale.] But if a prior action concerning the peculium is still pending and judgment is rendered in a subsequent action, no account whatsoever of the prior action ought to be taken in the subsequent condemnation; because in an action concerning the peculium, the condition of the one who preempts is better, and he is deemed to preempt not who first joined issue, but who first reached the judge's decision.