Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §14.6.3.pr-14.6.3.4

Exceptions and Grounds for Non-Application of the SC

Passage 2242 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

Discusses the grounds for the non-application of the Senatus Consultum Macedonianum. It explains that the decree does not apply if the creditor believed without negligence that the borrower was a pater familias, if the borrower was a tax farmer, if the borrower was a minor whose status was hard to know, if the debt arose from contracts other than loans, or if the credit was extended after the borrower became a pater familias.

[IDEM libro uicensimo nono ad edictum. ] §14.6.3.prSi quis patrem familias esse credidit non uana simplicitate deceptus nec iuris ignorantia, sed quia publice pater familias plerisque uidebatur, sic agebat, sic contrahebat, sic muneribus fungebatur, cessabit senatus consultum.
[The same, On the Edict, Book 29] If anyone believed that a person was a pater familias, being deceived neither by groundless simplicity nor by ignorance of law, but because he publicly appeared to most people to be a pater familias—so acting, so contracting, and so performing public offices—the senatus consultum will not apply.
§14.6.3.1Unde Iulianus libro duodecimo in eo, qui uectigalia conducta habebat, scribit (et est saepe constitutum) cessare senatus consultum.
Hence Julian writes in his twelfth book that in the case of one who had farmed the public taxes (and this has often been established), the senatus consultum does not apply.
§14.6.3.2Proinde et in eo, qui scire non potuit, an filius familias sit, Iulianus libro duodecimo cessare senatus consultum ait, ut puta in pupillo uel minore uiginti quinque annis.
Accordingly, also in the case of one who could not know whether the other was a filius familias, Julian says in his twelfth book that the senatus consultum does not apply, as, for example, in the case of a ward or a minor under twenty-five years.
sed in minore, causa cognita et a praetore succurrendum: in pupillo autem etiam alia ratione debuit dicere cessare senatus consultum, quod mutua pecunia non fit, quam sine tutoris auctoritate pupillus dat, quemadmodum ipse dicit Iulianus libro duodecimo, si filius familias crediderit, cessare senatus consultum, quod mutua pecunia non fit, quamuis liberam peculii administrationem habuit: non enim perdere ei peculium pater concedit, cum peculii administrationem permittit: et ideo uindicationem nummorum patri superesse ait.
But in the case of a minor, relief should be granted by the praetor after investigation of the case; whereas in the case of a ward, he ought to have said that the senatus consultum does not apply also for another reason: namely, that money which a ward gives without his tutor's authority does not become a loan. Just as Julian himself says in his twelfth book, if a filius familias has lent, the senatus consultum does not apply, because it does not become a loan, even though he had free administration of his peculium; for a father does not permit him to lose the peculium when he allows the administration of the peculium, and therefore, he says, the action for the recovery of the coins remains to the father.
§14.6.3.3Is autem solus senatus consultum offendit, qui mutuam pecuniam filio familias dedit, non qui alias contraxit, puta uendidit locauit uel alio modo contraxit: nam pecuniae datio perniciosa parentibus eorum uisa est.
Moreover, only he violates the senatus consultum who has given money as a loan to a filius familias, not he who has contracted otherwise, for example, has sold, leased, or contracted in another manner; for the giving of money was seen as ruinous to their parents.
et ideo etsi in creditum abii filio familias uel ex causa emptionis uel ex alio contractu, in quo pecuniam non numeraui, etsi stipulatus sim: licet coeperit esse mutua pecunia, tamen quia pecuniae numeratio non concurrit, cessat senatus consultum.
And therefore, even if I have become a creditor of a filius familias either on account of a sale or from some other contract in which I did not count out money, even if I have made a stipulation: although it has begun to be a loan of money, nevertheless, because the counting out of money does not concur, the senatus consultum does not apply.
quod ita demum erit dicendum, si non fraus senatus consulto sit cogitata, ut qui credere non potuit magis ei uenderet, ut ille rei pretium haberet in mutui uicem.
This, however, is only to be said if no fraud against the senatus consultum was intended, as where one who could not lend sold something to him instead, so that the other might have the price of the thing in place of a loan.
§14.6.3.4Si a filio familias stipulatus sim et patri familias facto crediderim, siue capite deminutus sit siue morte patris uel alias sui iuris sine capitis deminutione fuerit effectus, debet dici cessare senatus consultum, quia mutua iam patri familias data est:
If I have made a stipulation with a filius familias and then have given credit to him after he has become a pater familias, whether he has suffered a capitis deminutio or has been made sui iuris without capitis deminutio by the death of his father or otherwise, it must be said that the senatus consultum does not apply, because the loan has now been given to a pater familias.

Notes

  1. 14.6.3.prnon uana simplicitate deceptus — deceptus is a perfect participle agreeing with the subject of the conditional clause, the indefinite pronoun quis. non uana simplicitate (not deceived by empty simplicity) and nec iuris ignorantia (nor by ignorance of the law) indicate the objective standard of "absence of negligence" in believing the other party to be a pater familias.
  2. 14.6.3.2causa cognita et a praetore succurrendum — succurrendum is an impersonal gerundive with esse omitted, and a praetore functions as the ablative of agent. causa cognita (the case having been investigated) is an ablative absolute. This construction indicates that relief for a minor under twenty-five should be granted by the praetor not automatically, but based on an individual judicial inquiry.
  3. 14.6.3.2si filius familias crediderit — The verb credere means not only "to believe" but also "to lend, extend credit." Here, in light of the following causal clause quod mutua pecunia non fit (because it does not become a loan of money) and the context concerning the administration of the peculium, it is appropriate to interpret it as "has lent or extended credit."
  4. 14.6.3.3in creditum abii — in creditum ire is a Roman legal idiom meaning "to become a creditor." abii is the first-person singular perfect of eo (to go). It refers to the case where a claim arises as a result of a contract (such as a sale) that does not involve the direct physical transfer of cash.
  5. 14.6.3.3quod ita demum erit dicendum, si... — ita demum... si is a construction indicating a strong limitation: "this is to be said only if..." It implies that if there is an attempt to evade the senatus consultum by pretending to enter into a different contract (e.g., selling goods to a filius familias so that he may immediately resell them to obtain cash), such an act of circumvention is not exempt, and the decree will indeed apply.

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §14.6.3.pr-14.6.3.4. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:14.6.3.pr-14.6.3.4

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.