[ULPIANUS libro trigensimo ad edictum. ] §12.3.3.prNummis depositis iudicem non oportet in litem iusiurandum deferre, ut iuret quisque quod sua interfuit, cum certa sit nummorum aestimatio.
[ULPIANUS, Thirtieth Book on the Edict.] In the case of deposited coins, the judge ought not to tender the oath in court, so that each person may swear to what his interest was, since the valuation of coins is certain; unless, perhaps, someone should swear concerning this, namely, that it was to his interest that the coins be returned to him on his due date.
nisi forte de eo quis iuret, quod sua interfuit nummos sibi sua die redditos esse: quid enim, si sub poena pecuniam debuit? aut sub pignore, quod, quia deposita ei pecunia adnegata est, distractum est?
For what if he owed money under a penalty? Or under a pledge which, because the deposited money was denied to him, was sold?