[ULPIANUS libro uicensimo quarto ad edictum. ] §11.6.5.prSi mensor non falsum modum renuntiauerit, sed traxerit renuntiationem et ob hoc euenerit ut uenditor liberetur, qui ad signaturum se modum intra certum diem promisit, haec actio locum non habet: sed nec dari utilem debere Pomponius ait.
[ULPIAN, from the twenty-fourth book on the Edict.] If a surveyor has not reported a false measurement, but has delayed the report, and on this account it has happened that the seller—who promised to certify the measurement himself within a certain day—is released, this action does not lie; but Pomponius says that not even an equitable action ought to be granted.
erit ergo ad actionem de dolo decurrendum.
Therefore, recourse must be had to the action for fraud.
§11.6.5.1Si cum falsus modus renuntiatus esset, emptor cum uenditore ex empto egisset, agere poterit etiam cum mensore: sed si nihil eius interest, condemnari mensorem non oportet.
If, when a false measurement had been reported, the buyer had sued the seller on the purchase, he can also sue the surveyor; but if it is of no interest to him, the surveyor ought not to be condemned.
quod si non de toto modo qui deerat cum uenditore egerit, sed de minore, consequenter scribit Pomponius de residuo cum mensore agi posse.
But if he has sued the seller not for the whole of the missing measurement, but for a lesser amount, Pomponius consequently writes that a suit can be brought against the surveyor for the residue.
§11.6.5.2Hoc iudicium latius praetor porrexit: nam et si cuius alterius rei mensuram falsam renuntiauissse dicetur, haec actio competit.
The praetor extended this action more widely; for even if he is said to have reported a false measurement of any other thing, this action is available.
proinde si in aedificii mensura fefellit uel in frumenti uel in uini,
Hence, if he has erred in the measurement of a building, or of grain, or of wine...