[GAIUS libro septimo ad edictum prouinciale. ] §10.3.11.prIn summa admonendi sumus, quod, si post interitum rei communis is, cui aliquid ex communione praestari oportet, eo nomine agere uelit, communi diuidundo iudicium utile datur: ueluti si actor impensas aliquas in rem communem fecit, siue socius eius solus aliquid ex ea re lucratus est, uelut operas serui mercedesue, hoc iudicio eorum omnium ratio habetur.
[GAIUS, from the seventh book on the Provincial Edict.] In short, we must be advised of the fact that, if after the destruction of the common property a person to whom something ought to be performed out of the co-ownership wishes to bring an action on that account, an analogous action for partition of common property is granted: for example, if the plaintiff has made some expenditures on the common property, or if his partner alone has gained something from that property, such as the services of a slave or wages, an account is taken of all these things in this action.