[PAULUS libro primo decretorum. ] §10.2.41.prQuaedam mulier ab iudice appellauerat, quod diceret eum de diuidenda hereditate inter se et coheredem non tantum res, sed et libertos diuisisse et alimenta, quae dari testator certis libertis iussisset: nullo enim iure id eum fecisse.
[PAULUS, from the first book of Opinions.] A certain woman had appealed from the judge, because she alleged that, in partitioning the inheritance between herself and her co-heir, he had divided not only the property but also the freedmen and the maintenance which the testator had ordered to be given to certain freedmen; for she argued that he had done this with no legal right.
ex diuerso respondebatur consensisse eos diuisioni et multis annis alimenta secundum diuisionem praestitisse.
On the other side, it was answered that they had consented to the division and had for many years provided the maintenance in accordance with that division.
placuit standum esse alimentorum praestationi: sed et illud adiecit nullam esse libertorum diuisionem.
It was decided that the provision of the maintenance must be adhered to; but he also added this, that the division of freedmen was null.