[ULPIANUS libro primo ad legem Iuliam et Papiam. ] §1.9.7.prEmancipatum a patre senatore quasi senatoris filium haberi placet.
[ULPIANUS, On the Lex Julia et Papia, book 1] It is accepted that a person emancipated by a father who is a senator is regarded as the son of a senator.
§1.9.7.1Item Labeo scribit etiam eum, qui post mortem patris senatoris natus sit, quasi senatoris filium esse.
Likewise, Labeo writes that even he who is born after the death of a father who was a senator is regarded as the son of a senator.
sed eum, qui posteaquam pater eius de senatu motus est, concipitur et nascitur, Proculus et Pegasus opinantur non esse quasi senatoris filium, quorum sententia uera est: nec enim proprie senatoris filius dicetur is, cuius pater senatu motus est antequam iste nasceretur.
But as for him who is conceived and born after his father has been removed from the senate, Proculus and Pegasus are of the opinion that he is not the son of a senator, and their opinion is correct; for indeed, he whose father was removed from the senate before he was born will not properly be called the son of a senator.
si quis conceptus quidem sit, antequam pater eius senatu moueatur, natus autem post patris amissam dignitatem, magis est ut quasi senatoris filius intellegatur: tempus enim conceptionis spectandum plerisque placuit.
If, however, anyone was conceived before his father was removed from the senate, but born after his father had lost his dignity, it is more reasonable that he should be understood as the son of a senator; for it has pleased the majority that the time of conception should be regarded.
§1.9.7.2Si quis et patrem et auum habuerit senatorem, et quasi filius et quasi nepos senatoris intellegitur.
If anyone has had both a father and a grandfather who were senators, he is understood both as the son and as the grandson of a senator.
sed si pater amiserit dignitatem ante conceptionem huius, quaeri poterit an, quamuis quasi senatoris filius non intellegatur, quasi nepos tamen intellegi debeat: et magis est ut debeat, ut aui potius ei dignitas prosit, quam obsit casus patris.
But if the father lost his dignity before the conception of this person, it may be asked whether, although he is not understood as the son of a senator, he ought nevertheless to be understood as a grandson; and it is more reasonable that he ought to be, so that the dignity of the grandfather may rather benefit him than the misfortune of the father injure him.