[ULPIANUS libro uicensimo sexto ad Sabinum. ] §1.7.22.prSi adrogator decesserit impubere relicto filio adoptiuo et mox impubes decedat, an heredes adrogatoris teneantur? et dicendum est heredes quoque restituturos et bona adrogati et praeterea quartam partem.
[ULPIAN, on Sabinus, book 26.] If an arrogator dies, leaving an impuberal adopted son, and soon afterwards the impuberal son dies, are the heirs of the arrogator bound? And it must be said that the heirs also must restore both the property of the arrogated person and, in addition, the fourth part.
§1.7.22.1Sed an impuberi adrogator substituere possit, quaeritur: et puto non admitti substitutionem, nisi forte ad quartam solam quam ex bonis eius consequitur, et hactenus ut ei usque ad pubertatem substituat.
But it is asked whether an arrogator can substitute an heir to an impuberal son; and I think that substitution is not admitted, unless perhaps only with respect to the fourth part which he obtains from his property, and only so far as to substitute an heir for him up to the age of puberty.
ceterum si fidei eius committat, ut quandoque restituat, non oportet admitti fideicommissum, quia hoc non iudicio eius ad eum peruenit, sed principali prouidentia.
However, if he should commit to his trust to restore it at some time, the trust (fideicommissum) ought not to be admitted, because this did not come to him by his judgment, but by imperial providence.
§1.7.22.2Haec omnia dicenda sunt, siue in locum filii siue in locum nepotis aliquis impuberem adrogauerit.
All these things must be said, whether someone has arrogated an impuberal person in the place of a son or in the place of a grandson.