§9.34.1haec sine ullius adsensu cavillante Appio “en” inquit, “Quirites, illius Appi progenies, qui decemvir in annum creatus altero anno se ipse creavit, §9.34.2tertio nec ab se nec ab ullo creatus privatus fasces et imperium obtinuit nec ante continuando abstitit magistratu, quam obruerent eum male parta, male gesta, male retenta imperia. §9.34.3haec est eadem familia, Quirites, cuius vi atque iniuriis conpulsi extorres patria Sacrum montem cepistis; §9.34.4haec, adversus quam tribunicium auxilium vobis comparastis; haec, propter quam duo exercitus Aventinum insedistis; haec, quae faenebres leges, haec, quae agrarias semper inpugnavit. §9.34.5haec conubia patrum et plebis interrupit;
\nThese things Appius quibbling without the assent of anyone, he said: "Behold, Quirites, the offspring of that Appius, who, having been created decemvir for a year, in the second year created himself;\n\nin the third, created neither by himself nor by anyone, as a private citizen held the fasces and command, nor did he cease from continuing his magistracy before his ill-gotten, ill-conducted, and ill-retained powers overwhelmed him.\n\nThis is the same family, Quirites, compelled by whose violence and injustices, banished from your country, you occupied the Sacred Mount;\n\nthis, against which you prepared for yourselves the tribunician aid; this, on account of which as two armies you occupied the Aventine; this, which has always attacked the usury laws, this, the agrarian laws.\n\nThis interrupted the marriages of the patricians and the plebs; this blocked the path of the plebs to the curule offices.
haec plebi ad curules magistratus iter obsaepsit. hoc est nomen multo quam Tarquiniorum infestius vestrae libertati. §9.34.6itane tandem, Appi Claudi? cum centesimus iam annus sit ab Mam.
This is a name far more hostile to your liberty than that of the Tarquins.\n\nIs it really so, Appius Claudius?
Aemilio dictatore, tot censores fuerint, nobilissimi fortissimique viri, nemo eorum duodecim tabulas legit? nemo id ius esse, quod postremo populus iussisset, sciit? §9.34.7immo vero omnes scierunt et ideo Aemiliae potius legi paruerunt quam illi antiquae, qua primum censores creati erant, quia hanc postremam iusserat populus et quia, ubi duae contrariae leges sunt, semper antiquae obrogat nova. §9.34.8an hoc dicis, Appi, non teneri Aemilia lege populum? an populum teneri, te unum exlegem esse? §9.34.9tenuit Aemilia lex violentos illos censores C. Furium et M. Geganium, qui, quid iste magistratus in re publica mali facere posset, indicarunt, cum ira finitae potestatis Mam. Aemilium, principem aetatis suae belli domique, aerarium fecerunt; §9.34.10tenuit deinceps omnes censores intra centum annorum spatium; §9.34.11tenet C. Plautium, collegam tuum, iisdem auspiciis, eodem iure creatum.
Since it is now the hundredth year from the dictator Mamercus Aemilius, and there have been so many censors, most noble and brave men, did none of them read the Twelve Tables? Did no one know that that was the law which the people had last ordered?\n\nNay, indeed, they all knew it, and therefore they obeyed the Aemilian law rather than that ancient one under which censors were first created, because the people had ordered this last, and because, where there are two contrary laws, a new one always abrogates the old.\n\nOr do you say this, Appius, that the people are not bound by the Aemilian law? Or that the people are bound, but you alone are above the law?\n\nThe Aemilian law bound those violent censors Gaius Furius and Marcus Geganius, who showed what evil that office could do in the state, when, from anger at their power being limited, they made Mamercus Aemilius, the foremost man of his age in war and peace, an aerarius;\n\nit bound in turn all the censors within the space of a hundred years;\n\nit binds Gaius Plautius, your colleague, created under the same auspices, with the same right.
an hunc non, ut qui optimo iure censor creatus esset, populus creavit? tu unus eximius es, in quo hoc praecipuum ac singulare valeat? §9.34.12quem tu regem sacrificiorum crees? amplexus regni nomen, ut qui optimo iure rex Romae creatus sit, creatum se dicet.
Did the people not elect him as one who had been created censor with the highest right? Are you alone exceptional, in whom this special and singular privilege should prevail?\n\nWhom would you elect as King of the Sacrifices? Having embraced the name of kingship, he will say that he was elected, as one who has been created king of Rome with the highest right.
quem semestri dictatura, quem interregno quinque dierum contentum fore putes? quem clavi figendi aut ludorum causa dictatorem audacter crees? §9.34.13quam isti stolidos ac socordes videri creditis eos, qui intra vicesimum diem ingentibus rebus gestis dictatura se abdicaverunt aut qui vitio creati abierunt magistratu?
Whom would you think would be content with a six-month dictatorship, whom with a five-day interregnum? Whom would you boldly elect as dictator for the sake of driving the nail or for the games?\n\nHow stupid and sluggish do you think those men appear in his eyes—those who, having performed great deeds, abdicated the dictatorship within the twentieth day, or who, being elected with some defect, departed from their magistracy?\n\nWhy should I recall ancient things?
§9.34.14quid ego antiqua repetam? nuper intra decem annos C. Maenius dictator, quia, cum quaestiones severius, quam quibusdam potentibus tutum erat, exerceret, contagio eius, quod quaerebat ipse, criminis obiectata ab inimicis est, ut privatus obviam iret crimini, dictatura se abdicavit. §9.34.15nolo ego istam in te modestiam; ne degeneraveris a familia imperiosissima et superbissima; non die, non hora citius, quam necesse est, magistratu abieris, modo ne excedas finitum tempus.
Recently, within ten years, Gaius Maenius the dictator—because, when he was conducting investigations more severely than was safe for certain powerful men, the contagion of that very crime which he himself was investigating was cast upon him by his enemies—in order that as a private citizen he might face the charge, abdicated the dictatorship.\n\nI do not wish that modesty in you; do not degenerate from your most commanding and proud family; do not depart from your office a day or an hour sooner than is necessary, provided only you do not exceed the limited time.\n\nIs it enough to add a day or a month to the censorship?
§9.34.16satis est aut diem aut mensem censurae adicere? triennium, inquit, et sex menses ultra, quam licet Aemilia lege, censuram geram et solus geram. §9.34.17hoc quidem iam regno simile est.
"I will hold the censorship," he says, "for three years and six months beyond what is allowed by the Aemilian law, and I will hold it alone."\n\nThis indeed is already like a kingdom.
an collegam subrogabis, quem ne in demortui quidem locum subrogari fas est? §9.34.18paenitet enim, quod antiquissimum sollemne et solum ab ipso, cui fit, institutum deo ab nobilissimis antistitibus eius sacri ad servorum ministerium religiosus censor deduxisti, §9.34.19gens antiquior originibus urbis huius, hospitio deorum inmortalium sancta, propter te ac tuam censuram intra annum ab stirpe extincta est, nisi universam rem publicam eo nefario obstrinxeris, quod ominari etiam reformidat animus. §9.34.20urbs eo lustro capta est, quo demortuo C. Iulio censore L. Papirius Cursor, ne abiret magistratu, M. Cornelium Maluginensem collegam subrogavit. §9.34.21et quando modestior illius cupiditas fuit quam tua, Appi? nec solus nec ultra finitum lege tempus L. Papirius censuram gessit; tamen neminem invenit, qui se postea auctorem sequeretur; omnes deinceps censores post mortem collegae se magistratu abdicarunt. §9.34.22te nec quod dies exiit censurae, nec quod collega magistratu abiit, nec lex nec pudor coercet: virtutem in superbia, in audacia, in contemptu deorum hominumque ponis. §9.34.23ego te, Appi Claudi, pro istius magistratus maiestate ac verecundia, quem gessisti, non modo manu violatum, sed ne verbo quidem inclementiori a me appellatum vellem; §9.34.24sed et haec, quae adhuc egi, pervicacia tua et superbia coegit me loqui, et, nisi Aemiliae legi parueris, in vincula duci iubebo nec, §9.34.25cum ita conparatum a maioribus sit, ut comitiis censoriis, nisi duo confecerint legitima suffragia, non renuntiato altero comitia differantur, ego te, qui solus censor creari non possis, solum censuram gerere patiar. ”
Or will you substitute a colleague, whom it is not lawful to substitute even in the place of one deceased?\n\nFor are you sorry that, as a religious censor, you have degraded the most ancient solemn rite—the only one instituted by the very god to whom it is made—from the most noble priests of that sacred rite to the service of slaves,\n\nso that a family older than the origins of this city, hallowed by the hospitality of the immortal gods, has been utterly destroyed within a year on account of you and your censorship, unless you have bound the whole state by that crime, which the mind even dreads to presage.\n\nThe city was captured in that lustrum in which, the censor Gaius Julius having died, Lucius Papirius Cursor, lest he should depart from office, substituted Marcus Cornelius Maluginensis as his colleague.\n\nAnd when was his desire more moderate than yours, Appius? Lucius Papirius did not hold the censorship alone, nor beyond the time limited by law; yet he found no one who would follow him as an exemplar afterwards; all censors in succession abdicated their office after the death of a colleague.\n\nAs for you, neither the fact that the days of your censorship have expired, nor that your colleague has departed from office, nor law, nor shame restrains you; you place virtue in pride, in audacity, in contempt of gods and men.\n\nI indeed, Appius Claudius, for the majesty and respectability of that office which you held, could have wished you not only not to be violated by hand, but not even to be addressed by me with any harsher word;\n\nbut both these things, which I have spoken up to now, your obstancy and pride have compelled me to say, and, unless you obey the Aemilian law, I will order you to be led to prison, nor,\n\nsince it was so established by our ancestors that at the censorial comitia, unless two have completed the lawful votes, without one being declared elected the assembly is postponed, will I suffer you, who could not be created censor alone, to hold the censorship alone."\n\nWhen he had said these and such things, he ordered the censor to be seized and led to prison.
§9.34.26haec taliaque cum dixisset, prendi censorem et in vincula duci iussit. adprobantibus sex tribunis actionem collegae tres appellanti Appio auxilio fuerunt; summaque invidia omnium ordinum solus censuram gessit.
While six tribunes approved the action of their colleague, three brought aid to Appius when he appealed; and with the greatest unpopularity of all classes, he held the censorship alone.