Humanitext Reader

Livy · History of Rome §8.32.1-8.32.18

Papirius' Accusation and the Condemnation of Fabius

Passage 430 of 1770 · Latin

Summary

The dictator Papirius returns and severely questions the master of the horse Fabius for his breach of military discipline, ordering his execution, which leads to high tension due to the pleas of the legates and the fierce resistance of the soldiers.

§8.32.1clamor e tota contione ortus, uti bonum animum haberet: neminem illi vim adlaturum salvis legionibus Romanis.
A shout arose from the entire assembly, telling him to keep a good heart: no one would bring violence upon him as long as the Roman legions were safe.
haud multo post dictator advenit classicoque extemplo ad contionem advocavit.
Not long after, the dictator arrived and immediately called them to an assembly by a trumpet.
§8.32.2tum silentio facto praeco Q. Fabium magistrum equitum citavit.
Then, silence having been made, the herald summoned Q. Fabius, the master of the horse.
qui simul ex inferiore loco ad tribunal accessit, §8.32.3tum dictator “quaero” inquit “de te, Q. Fabi, cum summum imperium dictatoris sit pareantque ei consules, regia potestas, praetores, iisdem auspiciis quibus consules creati, aequum censeas necne magistrum equitum dicto audientem esse?
As soon as he approached the tribunal from a lower position, the dictator said: "I ask of you, Q. Fabius, since the supreme power belongs to the dictator, and the consuls, who possess kingly power, and the praetors, created under the same auspices as the consuls, obey him, whether you think it right or not that the master of the horse should be obedient to his command?
§8.32.4itemque illud interrogo, cum me incertis auspiciis profectum ab domo scirem, utrum mihi turbatis religionibus res publica in discrimen committenda fuerit, an auspicia repetenda, ne quid dubiis dis agerem?
And likewise I ask this, since I knew that I had set out from home with uncertain auspices, whether, when the religious rites were disturbed, I ought to have committed the commonwealth to danger, or whether the auspices should have been repeated, so that I might do nothing while the gods were doubtful?
§8.32.5simul illud, quae dictatori religio inpedimento ad rem gerendam fuerit, num ea magister equitum solutus ac liber potuerit esse? sed quid ego haec interrogo, cum, si ego tacitus abissem, tamen tibi ad voluntatis interpretationem meae dirigenda tua sententia fuerit?
At the same time, I ask what religious constraint that was a hindrance to the dictator in conducting affairs could the master of the horse have been free and exempt from? But why do I ask these things, when, even if I had departed in silence, your judgment ought to have been directed toward the interpretation of my will?
§8.32.6quin tu respondes, vetuerimne te quicquam rei me absente agere, vetuerimne signa cum hostibus conferre?
Why do you not answer whether I forbade you to do any business in my absence, and whether I forbade you to join battle with the enemy?
§8.32.7quo tu imperio meo spreto, incertis auspiciis, turbatis religionibus adversus morem militarem disciplinamque maiorum et numen deorum ausus es cum hoste confligere.
Despising this command of mine, with uncertain auspices and disturbed religious rites, contrary to military custom, the discipline of our ancestors, and the will of the gods, you dared to fight with the enemy.
§8.32.8ad haec, quae interrogatus es, responde; at extra ea cave vocem mittas.
Answer to these things about which you have been asked; but beware of uttering a word beyond them.
accede, lictor. ” §8.32.9aduersus quae singula cum respondere haud facile esset et nunc quereretur eundem accusatorem capitis sui ac iudicem esse, modo vitam sibi eripi citius quam gloriam rerum gestarum posse vociferaretur purgaretque se in vicem atque ultro accusaret, §8.32.10tunc Papirius redintegrata ira spoliari magistrum equitum ac virgas et secures expediri iussit.
Approach, lictor." Since it was not easy to answer these individual points, and at one moment he complained that the same man was the accuser of his life and his judge, and at another moment he cried out that his life could be snatched away sooner than the glory of his achievements, and in turn cleared himself and moreover accused the other, then Papirius, with renewed anger, ordered the master of the horse to be stripped and the rods and axes to be prepared.
§8.32.11Fabius fidem militum inplorans lacerantibus vestem lictoribus ad triarios tumultum ultima in contione miscentes sese recepit.
Fabius, imploring the protection of the soldiers while the lictors were tearing his clothing, withdrew to the triarii, who were stirring up a tumult in the outermost part of the assembly.
§8.32.12inde clamor in totam contionem est perlatus.
From there, the shout was carried into the whole assembly.
alibi preces, alibi minae audiebantur; qui proximi forte tribunali steterant, quia subiecti oculis imperatoris noscitari poterant, orabant, ut parceret magistro equitum neu cum eo exercitum damnaret; §8.32.13extrema contio et circa Fabium globus increpabant inclementem dictatorem nec procul seditione aberant.
In one place prayers, in another threats were heard; those who by chance had stood nearest the tribunal, because they could be recognized under the eyes of the commander, were begging him to spare the master of the horse and not to condemn the army along with him; the outer assembly and the crowd around Fabius were reproaching the merciless dictator and were not far from mutiny.
ne tribunal quidem satis quietum erat; §8.32.14legati circumstantes sellam orabant, ut rem in posterum diem differret et irae suae spatium et consilio tempus daret: §8.32.15satis castigatam adulescentiam Fabi esse, satis deformatam victoriam; ne ad extremum finem supplicii tenderet neu unico iuveni, neu patri eius, clarissimo viro, neu Fabiae genti eam iniungeret ignominiam.
Not even the tribunal was peaceful enough; the legates, standing around his chair, were begging him to defer the matter to the next day, and to give space to his anger and time for deliberation: saying that the youth of Fabius had been sufficiently chastised, and his victory sufficiently defaced; let him not press toward the extreme limit of punishment, nor inflict such ignominy upon an extraordinary youth, or upon his father, a most illustrious man, or upon the Fabian family.
§8.32.16cum parum precibus, parum causa proficerent, intueri saevientem contionem iubebant: ita inritatis militum animis subdere ignem ac materiam seditioni non esse aetatis, non prudentiae eius;
When they made little progress by prayers or by the merits of the case, they urged him to look at the raging assembly: with the minds of the soldiers thus irritated, to supply fire and fuel for mutiny was not suited to his age, nor to his prudence; no one would turn it into a fault against Q.
§8.32.17neminem id Q. Fabio poenam deprecanti suam vitio versurum, sed dictatori, si occaecatus ira infestam multitudinem in se pravo certamine movisset.
Fabius for deprecating his own punishment, but they would against the dictator, if, blinded by anger, he had stirred up the hostile multitude against himself in a perverse contest.
§8.32.18postremo, ne id se gratiae dare.
Finally, lest he should believe they were granting this to the favor of Q.
Q. Fabi crederet, se ius iurandum dare paratos esse non videri e re publica in Q. Fabium eo tempore animadverti.
Fabius, they said they were ready to take an oath that it did not seem to be for the public good that Q. Fabius should be punished at that time.","zh":" 全体大会上爆发出一阵呼声,要他保持好心态:只要罗马军团安然无恙,就没人能对他施加暴力。不久之后,独裁官抵达,并立即用号角召集大会。随后,在全场安静下来后,宣告员传唤了骑兵长官昆图斯·法比乌斯。他一从较低的位置走近讲坛,独裁官便说:“昆图斯·法比乌斯,我问你,既然独裁官拥有最高权力,而拥有王权的执政官,以及与执政官在相同占卜下选出的法务官都服从他,你认为骑兵长官应当还是不应当听从他的命令?同样地,我也问这一点:既然我知道自己是在不确定的占卜下离开家园的,那么在宗教仪式受到干扰的情况下,我是应该把国家置于险境,还是应该重新进行占卜,以免在神明意图不明时采取行动?同时我也问,有什么妨碍独裁官行事的宗教约束,是骑兵长官可以免除和解脱的?但为什么我要问这些呢?因为即使我保持沉默离去,你的判断也应该朝着阐释我的意愿的方向走(即理应推测并顺从我的意图)。你为什么不回答:我是否曾禁止你在我不在时采取任何军事行动,是否曾禁止你与敌人交战?你无视了我的这项命令,在不确定的占卜和受到干扰的宗教仪式中,违背军事惯例、先祖的纪律以及神明的旨意,竟敢与敌人交战。回答这些对你的提问;但千万不要说这些以外的话。过来,侍从。” 面对这些逐一提出的问题,他很难一一回答,他一会儿抱怨说同一个既是针对他性命的控告者又是裁判官,一会儿大声疾呼说夺走他的生命比夺走他立功的荣耀更容易,他轮番为自己辩护并反过来指责对方,这时,帕皮里乌斯再次燃起怒火,命令剥去骑兵长官的衣服,并准备好皮鞭和斧头。法比乌斯在侍从们撕扯他衣服时,哀求士兵们的保护,退到了在大会边缘制造混乱的第三列兵那里。叫喊声从此传遍了整个大会。有的地方听到的是哀求,有的地方听到的是威胁;那些恰好站在讲坛最近处的人,因为在主帅的注视下容易被认出,便哀求他宽恕骑兵长官,不要连同他一起惩罚军队;外围的大众以及聚集在法比乌斯周围的人群则怒斥冷酷无情的独裁官,离叛乱仅一步之遥。甚至连讲坛上也无法保持足够的平静;围在座椅周围的副官们恳求他将此事推迟到第二天,给自己的愤怒留出缓和的空间,给深思熟虑留出时间:他们说,对法比乌斯年轻气盛的惩戒已经足够,胜利也已被足够地玷污;让他不要逼迫到惩罚的极端,也不要将这种耻辱强加给这位无双的青年,或他的父亲——一位极显赫的人物,或法比乌斯家族。当他们用哀求和道理都收效甚微时,便敦促他看看激愤的大会:在士兵们情绪如此激昂的情况下,煽风点火并为叛乱提供口实,这既不符合他的年龄,也不符合他的睿智;没有人会把为自己免除处罚而祈求一事归咎于昆图斯·法比乌斯,但如果独裁官因愤怒而蒙蔽双眼,在一场不正当的抗争中将心怀敌意的群众引向自己,人们就会归咎于独裁官。最后,为了不让他以为他们是看在昆图斯·法比乌斯的面子上才这么做,他们表示准备宣誓:在此时对昆图斯·法比乌斯施加处罚,在他们看来不符合国家的利益。

Notes

  1. §8.32.3consules, regia potestas — regia potestas is used in apposition to consules, emphasizing that the power of the Republican consuls was equivalent to that of kings.
  2. §8.32.5dirigenda tua sententia fuerit — Though part of a past contrary-to-fact conditional sentence, the use of the passive periphrastic conjugational form with fuerit (the subjunctive perfect, representing the indicative perfect fuit in indirect speech) strongly emphasizes a factual and objective obligation rather than a mere potentiality (which would be expressed by fuisset).
  3. §8.32.8cave vocem mittas — The verb cave is followed directly by the present subjunctive mittas without ut or ne, forming an emphatic and colloquial negative command (prohibition).
  4. §8.32.16non esse aetatis, non prudentiae eius — The genitives aetatis and prudentiae are used predicatively with esse to denote characteristic or fitness ('it is not characteristic of his age, nor of his prudence').
  5. §8.32.17vitio versurum — The expression employs the double dative idiom vitio vertere (to turn into a fault), with vitio as the dative of purpose/result and Q. Fabio / dictatori as the datives of reference/person.
  6. §8.32.18ne id se gratiae dare Q. Fabi crederet — The clause ne... crederet represents an indirect negative command or advice given by the legates. In the phrase gratiae dare (to attribute to favor), Q. Fabi functions as an objective genitive.

Cite this passage

Livy, History of Rome §8.32.1-8.32.18. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:8.32.1-8.32.18

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.