Humanitext Reader

Livy · History of Rome §34.24.1-34.24.7

Speech of Aristaenus and the Decision for War against Nabis

Passage 1191 of 1770 · Latin

Summary

Aristaenus of the Achaeans vehemently denounces the Aetolians as savage plunderers and implores Roman intervention. In response, Flamininus submits the question of war against Nabis to the council, and war is unanimously decreed.

§34.24.1haec vaniloquentia primum Aristaenum praetorem Achaeorum, excitavit.
These empty words first aroused Aristaenus, the praetor of the Achaeans.
§34.24.2“ne istuc” inquit “Iuppiter optimus maximus sirit Iunoque regina, cuius in tutela Argi sunt, ut illa civitas inter tyrannum Lacedaemonium et latrones Aetolos praemium sit posita in eo discrimine, ut miserius a vobis recipiatur, quam ab illo capta est.
“May Jupiter, Best and Greatest,” he said, “and Queen Juno, under whose protection Argos is, never permit this: namely, that that city should be placed in such peril as to be a prize between the Lacedaemonian tyrant and the Aetolian robbers, so that it should be recovered by you more miserably than it was captured by him.
§34.24.3mare interiectum ab istis praedonibus non tuetur nos, T. Quincti; quid, si in media Peloponneso arcem sibi fecerint, futurum nobis est? linguam tantum Graecorum habent, sicut speciem hominum;
The intervening sea does not protect us from those plunderers, Titus Quinctius; what, then, will become of us if they establish a stronghold for themselves in the middle of the Peloponnese?
§34.24.4moribus ritibusque efferatioribus quam ulli barbari, immo quam immanes beluae vivunt.
They possess only the language of the Greeks, just as they have the appearance of men; they live with customs and rites more savage than any barbarians, indeed, than monstrous beasts.
itaque vos rogamus, Romani, ut et ab Nabide Argos reciperetis et ita res Graeciae constituatis, ut ab latrocinio quoque Aetolorum satis pacata haec relinquatis. ” §34.24.5Romanus, cunctis undique increpantibus Aetolos, responsurum se fuisse iis dixit, nisi ita infensos omnis in eos videret, ut sedandi potius quam irritandi essent.
Therefore we entreat you, Romans, both to recover Argos from Nabis, and to settle the affairs of Greece in such a way that you leave this country sufficiently pacified from the robbery of the Aetolians as well.” The Roman, while everyone from all sides was railing against the Aetolians, said that he would have answered them, had he not seen that everyone was so incensed against them that they ought to be appeased rather than provoked.
§34.24.6contentum itaque opinione ea, quae de Romanis Aetolisque esset, referre se dixit, quid de Nabidis bello placeret, nisi redderet Achaeis Argos.
Therefore, saying that he was content with the opinion that existed concerning the Romans and Aetolians, he stated that he was bringing forward the question of what was pleased regarding the war with Nabis, unless he should restore Argos to the Achaeans.
§34.24.7cum omnes bellum decressent, auxilia ut pro viribus suis quaeque civitates mitterent, est hortatus.
When everyone had decreed war, he exhorted each of the states to send auxiliary forces according to their strength.
ad Aetolos legatum etiam misit, magis ut nudaret animos, id quod evenit, quam spe impetrari posse.
He also sent an envoy to the Aetolians, more to lay bare their intentions, as indeed happened, than in the hope that his demand could be obtained.

Notes

  1. 34.24.2ne istuc ... sirit ... ut ... — `sirit` is an archaic syncopated form of `siverit` (perfect subjunctive of `sinere`, expressing a wish). The demonstrative pronoun `istuc` (neuter accusative singular) anticipates the contents of the following `ut` clause.
  2. 34.24.5responsurum se fuisse ... nisi ... videret — A contrary-to-fact conditional sentence in indirect discourse. The apodosis, which would be in the pluperfect subjunctive in direct discourse (`respondissem`, "I would have answered"), is expressed by the future active participle with `fuisse` (`responsurum fuisse`). The protasis `nisi videret` (imperfect subjunctive) remains unchanged.
  3. 34.24.5ut sedandi potius quam irritandi essent — `sedandi` and `irritandi` are gerundives agreeing with `omnis` (the people who were incensed). It expresses that they (the angry crowd) were in a state of needing to be appeased rather than provoked.
  4. 34.24.7magis ut ... quam spe ... — An asymmetrical construction connected by the comparative `magis`. The first part is a purpose clause (`ut` + subjunctive), while the second part is a noun in the ablative case expressing cause or motive (`spe`), followed by an accusative with infinitive.

Cite this passage

Livy, History of Rome §34.24.1-34.24.7. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:34.24.1-34.24.7

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.