Humanitext Reader

Livy · History of Rome §2.15.1-2.15.7

Rome's Final Refusal of Tarquin and Lasting Peace with Porsinna

Passage 76 of 1770 · Latin

Summary

In response to Porsinna's final embassy, Rome sends distinguished senators to convey their refusal of monarchy and commitment to liberty. Respecting Rome's resolve, Porsinna ceases his support for Tarquin, restores hostages and land to establish a firm peace, while Tarquin goes into exile in Tusculum.

§2.15.1P. Lucretius et P. Valerius Publicola, Sp. Larcius inde et T. Herminius consules facti.
Publius Lucretius and Publius Valerius Publicola, then Spurius Larcius and Titus Herminius were made consuls.
eo anno postremum legati a Porsinna de reducendo in regnum Tarquinio venerunt.
In that year, for the last time, ambassadors came from Porsinna concerning the restoration of Tarquin to the throne.
quibus cum responsum esset missurum ad regem senatum legatos, missi confestim honoratissimus quisque e patribus: §2.15.2non quin breviter reddi responsum potuerit, non recipi reges, ideo potius delectos patrum ad eum missos, quam legatis eius Romae daretur responsum, sed ut in perpetuum mentio eius rei finiretur, neu in tantis mutuis beneficiis in vicem animi sollicitarentur, cum ille peteret, quod contra libertatem populi Romani esset, Romani, nisi in perniciem suam faciles esse vellent, negarent, cui nihil negatum vellent.
When it had been answered to them that the senate would send ambassadors to the king, immediately the most honorable of the senators were sent: not because a brief answer could not have been returned, that kings would not be received, and that the select of the senators were sent to him rather than an answer being given to his ambassadors at Rome for this reason, but so that mention of this matter might be ended forever, and lest, amidst such great mutual benefits, their minds should be mutually vexed, while he requested what was contrary to the liberty of the Roman people, and the Romans, unless they wished to be compliant to their own ruin, denied him to whom they wished to deny nothing.
§2.15.3non in regno populum Romanum, sed in libertate esse.
The Roman people were not under a kingship, but in freedom.
ita induxisse in animum, hostibus potius quam regibus portas patefacere; ea esse vota omnium, ut, qui libertati erit in illa urbe finis, idem urbi sit.
They had so resolved in their minds to open their gates to enemies rather than to kings; that this was the prayer of all, that whatever end there should be to liberty in that city, the same should be the end to the city.
§2.15.4proinde, si salvam esse vellet Romam, ut patiatur liberam esse, orare.
Therefore, if he wished Rome to be safe, they implored that he would suffer it to be free.
rex verecundia victus §2.15.5“quando id certum atque obstinatum est” inquit, “neque ego obtundam saepius eadem nequiquam agendo, nec Tarquinios spe auxilii, quod nullum in me est, frustrabor.
The king, overcome by respect, said: 'Since that is fixed and resolved, I will neither annoy you by repeatedly doing the same things in vain, nor will I deceive the Tarquins with the hope of assistance, which is not in my power.
alium hinc, seu bello opus est seu quiete, exilio quaerant locum, ne quid meam vobiscum pacem distineat. ” §2.15.6dictis facta amiciora adiecit: obsidum quod reliquum erat reddidit, agrum Veientem foedere ad Ianiculum icto ademptum restituit.
Let them seek another place from here for their exile, whether there is need of war or of quiet, so that nothing may interrupt my peace with you.' To his words he added friendlier deeds: he returned what remained of the hostages, and restored the Veientine territory which had been taken away by the treaty struck at the Janiculum.
§2.15.7Tarquinius spe omni reditus incisa exulatum ad generum Mamilium Octavium Tusculum abiit.
Tarquin, all hope of return having been cut off, went into exile to his son-in-law, Octavius Mamilius, at Tusculum.
Romanis pax fida ita cum Porsinna fuit.
Thus there was a faithful peace for the Romans with Porsinna.

Notes

  1. 2.15.1missi confestim ... honoratissimus quisque — Although the subject `honoratissimus quisque` is singular, it implies a plural meaning ('each of the most honored, i.e., all the most honored'), and thus the verb `missi [sunt]` is plural by synesis (agreement according to sense).
  2. 2.15.2non quin — `non quin` (equivalent to `non quod non`) introduces a rejected reason ('not because... not') and takes the subjunctive `potuerit`. The true affirmative reason is subsequently introduced by the `sed ut...` clause.
  3. 2.15.2cui nihil negatum vellent — The relative pronoun `cui` refers to Porsinna. The verb `vellent` is in the subjunctive primarily because it is a subordinate clause within indirect speech (oratio obliqua), but it also carries a characterizing nuance ('one to whom they would wish to deny nothing').
  4. 2.15.3qui libertati erit in illa urbe finis, idem urbi sit — The antecedent `finis` is incorporated into the relative clause `qui... finis`. In the main clause, `idem` stands for `idem finis`. Literally, 'what end there shall be to liberty..., let the same be to the city', emphasizing that the loss of liberty is identical to the destruction of the state.
  5. 2.15.4orare — An infinitive of statement (indirect speech) representing the main action of the ambassadors ('they prayed/implored'), with the subject accusative `se` omitted.

Cite this passage

Livy, History of Rome §2.15.1-2.15.7. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.humanitext-lat2:2.15.1-2.15.7

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.