Humanitext Reader

Cicero · Letters to Friends §13.26.1-13.26.4

Request for Assistance in the Lawsuit of L. Mescinius

Passage 322 of 413 · Latin

Summary

Cicero requests the recipient's fair and favorable assistance in a lawsuit in Achaia concerning the inheritance of his former quaestor and close friend, L. Mescinius, and asks him to refer the case to Rome if necessary.

§13.26.1L. Mescinius ea mecum necessitudine coniunctus est, quod mihi quaestor fuit; sed hanc causam, quam ego, ut a maioribus accepi, semper gravem duxi, fecit virtute et humanitate sua iustiorem.
L. Mescinius is connected with me by that bond which arises from his having been my quaestor; but this relationship, which I, as I received it from our ancestors, have always regarded as solemn, he has made even more binding by his own virtue and amiability.
itaque eo sic utor ut nec familiarius ullo nec libentius.
Therefore, I live on such terms with him that there is no one with whom I am more intimate or more glad to associate.
is quamquam confidere videbatur te sua causa quae honeste posses libenter esse facturum, magnum esse tamen speravit apud te meas quoque litteras pondus habituras.
Although he seemed to be confident that you would gladly do for his sake whatever you honorably could, he nevertheless hoped that my letter also would have great weight with you.
id cum ipse ita iudicabat tum pro familiari consuetudine saepe ex me audierat quam suavis esset inter nos et quanta coniunctio.
He not only judged so himself, but from our intimate intercourse he had often heard from me how pleasant and how great a connection there was between us.
§13.26.2peto igitur a te tanto scilicet studio, quanto intellegis debere me petere pro homine tam mihi necessario et tam familiari, ut eius negotia, quae sunt in Achaia ex eo quod heres est M. Mindio, fratri suo, qui Elide negotiatus est, explices et expedias cum iure et potestate, quam habes, tum etiam auctoritate et consilio tuo.
I entreat you, therefore, with all the earnestness which you understand I ought to show for a man so closely connected and so intimate with me, that you will adjust and expedite his affairs—which are in Achaia, arising from the fact that he is the heir to his brother M. Mindius, who was in business at Elis—not only with the law and power which you possess, but also with your authority and advice.
sic enim praescripsimus iis, quibus ea negotia mandavimus, ut omnibus in rebus, quae in aliquam controversiam vocarentur, te arbitro et, quod commodo tuo fieri posset, te disceptatore uterentur.
For we have so instructed those to whom we have committed those affairs, that in all matters which might be brought into any controversy, they should employ you as arbitrator, and, so far as may be done with your convenience, as umpire.
id ut honoris mei causa suscipias, vehementer te etiam atque etiam rogo.
That you will undertake this for the sake of my honor, I earnestly entreat you again and again.
§13.26.3illud praeterea, si non alienum tua dignitate putabis a esse, feceris mihi pergratum, si qui difficiliores erunt, ut rem sine controversia confici nolint, si eos, quoniam cum senatore res est, Romam reieceris.
Furthermore, if you do not think it inconsistent with your dignity, you will do me a very great favor if, should any prove rather difficult, so as to be unwilling to settle the matter without a lawsuit, you will refer them to Rome, since the business is with a senator.
quod quo minore dubitatione facere possis, litteras ad te a M. Lepido consule, non quae te aliquid iuberent (neque enim id tuae dignitatis esse arbitramur) sed quodam modo quasi commendaticias sumpsimus.
That you may be able to do this with less hesitation, we have obtained a letter to you from M. Lepidus the consul, not to command you in anything (for we do not think that would be consistent with your dignity), but in some sort as it were a letter of recommendation.
§13.26.4scriberem quam id beneficium bene apud Mescinium positurus esses, nisi et te scire confiderem et mihi peterem.
I would write how well you would be bestowing this favor on Mescinius, did I not both trust that you know it and ask it for myself.
sic enim velim existimes, non minus me de illius re laborare quam ipsum de sua.
For I would have you think that I am no less anxious about his business than he is himself about his own.
sed cum illum studeo quam facillime ad suum pervenire tum illud laboro ut non minimum hac mea commendatibne se consecutum arbitretur.
But while I am eager that he should attain his rights as easily as possible, so also I labor that he may consider himself to have obtained no small advantage by this recommendation of mine.

Notes

  1. §13.26.1ea mecum necessitudine coniunctus est, quod mihi quaestor fuit — A demonstrative correlation where the demonstrative adjective `ea` is explained by the conjunction `quod` (in that, because), forming an appositive clause. It refers to the official bond (`necessitudo`) established when Mescinius served as quaestor under Cicero during his provincial governorship.
  2. §13.26.1hanc causam — Here, `causa` does not mean 'cause' or 'lawsuit,' but refers to the 'relationship' or 'bond' of official connection between a quaestor and his superior officer, as mentioned in the preceding sentence. According to Roman tradition (`a maioribus`), this relationship was regarded as highly sacred and solemn (`gravem`).
  3. §13.26.3si qui difficiliores erunt, ut rem sine controversia confici nolint, si eos ... Romam reieceris — A complex structure where two `si` clauses appear in a nested or step-by-step manner. The main framework is a future perfect conditional sentence: `feceris mihi pergratum, si... reieceris` (you will do me a great favor if you refer them...), within which the premise `si qui difficiliores erunt` (if any should prove rather difficult) is inserted. The `ut` clause is a consecutive clause (or a clause of character) following the comparative adjective `difficiliores`, meaning 'so difficult as to be unwilling to settle the matter without controversy.'
  4. §13.26.4scriberem ... nisi et te scire confiderem et mihi peterem — A contrary-to-fact conditional sentence expressing a present unreality. The verb of the apodosis `scriberem` and the verbs of the protasis `confiderem` and `peterem` are all in the subjunctive imperfect. The logic is that Cicero does not write further about the recommendation because he now already trusts that the recipient knows it and is asking it as if for himself.

Cite this passage

Cicero, Letters to Friends §13.26.1-13.26.4. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi056.humanitext-lat1:13.26.1-13.26.4

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.