§38.6.1ἀνδρῶν.
men.
διὸ καὶ τῶν ἀρχαίων συγγραφέων οἱ λογιώτατοι δοκοῦσί μοι προσαναπεπαῦσθαι τῷ τρόπῳ τούτῳ, τινὲς μὲν μυθικαῖς καὶ διηγηματικαῖς κεχρημένοι παρεκβάσεσι, τινὲς δὲ καὶ πραγματικαῖς, ὥστε μὴ μόνον ἐν αὐτοῖς τοῖς κατὰ τὴν Ἑλλάδα τόποις ποιεῖσθαι τὰς μεταβάσεις, ἀλλὰ καὶ τῶν ἐκτὸς περιλαμβάνειν.
Therefore, even the most famous of the ancient historians seem to me to have taken additional rest in this manner, some employing mythical and narrative digressions, and others even practical ones, so that they made their transitions not only within the regions of Greece itself, but also embraced those outside.
§38.6.2λέγω δʼ οἷον ἐπειδὰν τὰ κατὰ τὴν Θετταλίαν ἐξηγούμενοι καὶ τὰς Ἀλεξάνδρου τοῦ Φεραίου πράξεις μεταξὺ τὰς κατὰ Πελοπόννησον Λακεδαιμονίων ἐπιβολὰς διηγῶνται, καὶ πάλιν τὰς παρὰ Θηβαίων, ἔτι δὲ τὰς κατὰ Μακεδονίαν ἢ τὴν Ἰλλυρίδα, κἄπειτα διατρίψαντες λέγωσι τὴν Ἰφικράτους εἰς Αἴγυπτον στρατείαν καὶ τὰ Κλεάρχῳ πραχθέντα παρανομήματα κατὰ τὸν Πόντον.
I mean, for instance, when, explaining affairs in Thessaly and the actions of Alexander of Pherae, they describe in the middle the attempts of the Lacedaemonians in the Peloponnese, and again those of the Thebans, and further those in Macedonia or Illyria, and then, after lingering, speak of the expedition of Iphicrates to Egypt and the lawless deeds committed by Clearchus in Pontus.
§38.6.3ἐξ ὧν κεχρημένους μὲν ἅπαντας εὕροι τις ἂν τῷ τοιούτῳ χειρισμῷ, κεχρημένους γε μὴν ἀτάκτως, ἡμᾶς δὲ τεταγμένως.
From which, one would find that all of them have employed such a treatment, yet indeed they have done so without order, whereas we have done so in an orderly manner.
§38.6.4ἐκεῖνοι μὲν γὰρ μνησθέντες πῶς Βάρδυλλις ὁ τῶν Ἰλλυριῶν βασιλεὺς καὶ Κερσοβλέπτης ὁ τῶν Θρᾳκῶν κατεκτήσαντο τὰς δυναστείας, οὐκέτι προστιθέασι τὸ συνεχές, οὐδʼ ἀνατρέχουσιν ἐπὶ τἀκόλουθον ἐκ διαστήματος, ἀλλὰ καθάπερ ἐν ποιήματι χρησάμενοι πάλιν ἐπανάγουσιν ἐπὶ τὰς ἐξ ἀρχῆς ὑποθέσεις.
For they, having mentioned how Bardyllis, the king of the Illyrians, and Cersobleptes, the king of the Thracians, acquired their principalities, no longer add the sequel, nor do they return after an interval to what followed, but, having used it as if in a poem, they lead back again to their original subjects.
§38.6.5ἡμεῖς δὲ πάντας διῃρημένοι τοὺς ἐπιφανεστάτους τόπους τῆς οἰκουμένης καὶ τὰς ἐν τούτοις πράξεις καὶ μίαν καὶ τὴν αὐτὴν ἔφοδον ἀεὶ ποιούμενοι κατὰ τὴν τάξιν τῆς διαλήψεως, ἔτι δὲ καθʼ ἕκαστον ἔτος ὡρισμένως ἐξηγούμενοι τὰς καταλλήλους πράξεις ἐνεστηκυίας, §38.6.6ἀπολείπομεν πρόδηλον τοῖς φιλομαθοῦσι τὴν ἐπαναγωγὴν ἐπὶ τὸν συνεχῆ λόγον καὶ τὰς μεσολαβηθείσας ἀεὶ τῶν πράξεων, ὥστε μηδὲν ἀτελὲς μηδʼ ἐλλιπὲς γίνεσθαι τοῖς φιληκόοις τῶν προειρημένων.
But we, having divided all the most famous regions of the inhabited world and the actions in them, and always making one and the same approach according to the order of our division, and further explaining definitely each year the corresponding actions that occurred, leave clear to those who are eager to learn the return to the continuous narrative and to the actions that were at each time interrupted, so that nothing of what has been said before becomes incomplete or deficient for those who love to hear.
§38.6.7καὶ περὶ μὲν τούτων ἐπὶ τοσοῦτον.
And regarding these matters, let this suffice.