§28.1.1ὅτι τοῦ πολέμου τοῦ περὶ Κοίλης Συρίας ἤδη καταρχὴν λαβόντος Ἀντιόχῳ καὶ Πτολεμαίῳ τοῖς βασιλεῦσιν, ἧκον πρέσβεις εἰς τὴν Ῥώμην παρὰ μὲν Ἀντιόχου Μελέαγρος καὶ Σωσιφάνης καὶ Ἡρακλείδης, παρὰ δὲ Πτολεμαίου Τιμόθεος καὶ Δάμων.
That, the war over Coele-Syria having already begun between the kings Antiochus and Ptolemy, ambassadors came to Rome, from Antiochus, Meleager, Sosiphanes, and Heracleides, and from Ptolemy, Timotheus and Damon.
§28.1.2συνέβαινε δὲ κρατεῖν τὸν Ἀντίοχον τῶν κατὰ Κοίλην Συρίαν καὶ Φοινίκην πραγμάτων.
And it happened that Antiochus was in control of the affairs in Coele-Syria and Phoenicia.
§28.1.3ἐξ οὗ γὰρ Ἀντίοχος ὁ πατὴρ τοῦ νῦν λεγομένου βασιλέως ἐνίκησε τῇ περὶ τὸ Πάνιον μάχῃ τοὺς Πτολεμαίου στρατηγούς, ἀπʼ ἐκείνων τῶν χρόνων ἐπείθοντο πάντες οἱ προειρημένοι τόποι τοῖς ἐν Συρίᾳ βασιλεῦσιν.
For ever since Antiochus, the father of the king now spoken of, defeated the generals of Ptolemy in the battle near Panium, from those times all the aforementioned places were subject to the kings in Syria.
§28.1.4διόπερ ὁ μὲν Ἀντίοχος ἡγούμενος τὴν κατὰ πόλεμον ἰσχυροτάτην καὶ καλλίστην εἶναι κτῆσιν, ὡς ὑπὲρ ἰδίων ἐποιεῖτο τὴν σπουδήν· §28.1.5ὁ δὲ Πτολεμαῖος ἀδίκως ὑπολαμβάνων τὸν πρότερον Ἀντίοχον συνεπιθέμενον τῇ τοῦ πατρὸς ὀρφανίᾳ παρῃρῆσθαι τὰς κατὰ Κοίλην Συρίαν πόλεις αὐτῶν, οὐχ οἷός τʼ ἦν ἐκείνῳ παραχωρεῖν τῶν τόπων τούτων.
Therefore Antiochus, on his part, believing that acquisition by war was the strongest and noblest kind of possession, showed his zeal as if on behalf of his own property; but Ptolemy, on his part, conceiving that the former Antiochus had unjustly deprived them of the cities in Coele-Syria by taking advantage of his father's orphanhood, was unable to cede these places to him.
διόπερ οἱ περὶ τὸν Μελέαγρον ἧκον, §28.1.6ἐντολὰς ἔχοντες μαρτύρεσθαι τὴν σύγκλητον διότι Πτολεμαῖος αὐτῷ παρὰ πάντα τὰ δίκαια τὰς χεῖρας ἐπιβάλλει πρότερος, §28.1.7οἱ δὲ περὶ τὸν Τιμόθεον περί τε τῆς τῶν φιλανθρώπων ἀνανεώσεως καὶ τοῦ διαλύειν τὸν πρὸς Περσέα πόλεμον, μάλιστα δὲ παρατηρεῖν τὰς τῶν περὶ τὸν Μελέαγρον ἐντεύξεις.
For this reason Meleager and his colleagues had come, having instructions to protest to the senate that Ptolemy, contrary to all justice, had been the first to lay hands on him, while Timotheus and his colleagues had come both to renew the friendly relations and to mediate in the war against Perseus, but most of all to watch the negotiations of Meleager and his embassy.
§28.1.8περὶ μὲν οὖν τῆς διαλύσεως οὐκ ἐθάρρησαν εἰπεῖν, Μάρκου συμβουλεύσαντος αὐτοῖς Αἰμιλίου· περὶ δὲ τῶν φιλανθρώπων ἀνανεωσάμενοι καὶ λαβόντες ἀποκρίσεις ἀκολούθους τοῖς ἀξιουμένοις ἐπανῆλθον εἰς τὴν Ἀλεξάνδρειαν.
Now, concerning the mediation, they did not venture to speak, Marcus Aemilius having advised them against it; but having renewed the friendly relations and received answers in conformity with their requests, they returned to Alexandria.
§28.1.9τοῖς δὲ περὶ τὸν Μελέαγρον ἡ σύγκλητος ἀπεκρίθη διότι Κοΐντῳ Μαρκίῳ δώσει τὴν ἐπιτροπὴν γράψαι περὶ τούτων πρὸς Πτολεμαῖον, ὡς αὐτῷ δοκεῖ συμφέρειν ἐκ τῆς ἰδίας πίστεως.
To Meleager and his colleagues, the senate replied that they would give Quintus Marcius instructions to write to Ptolemy concerning these matters in the way he thought most advantageous in accordance with his own good faith.
καὶ ταῦτα μὲν οὕτως ἐχειρίσθη κατὰ τὸ παρόν. —
And these matters were thus handled for the present. —