§24.11.1ὅτι Φιλοποίμενα καὶ Ἀρίσταινον τοὺς Ἀχαιοὺς συνέβη οὔτε τὴν φύσιν ὁμοίαν σχεῖν οὔτε τὴν αἵρεσιν τῆς πολιτείας.
That Philopoemen and Aristaenus, the Achaeans, happened to have neither a similar nature nor the same political policy.
§24.11.2ἦν γὰρ ὁ μὲν Φιλοποίμην εὖ πεφυκὼς πρὸς τὰς πολεμικὰς χρείας καὶ κατὰ τὸ σῶμα καὶ κατὰ τὴν ψυχήν, ὁ δʼ ἕτερος πρὸς τὰ πολιτικὰ τῶν διαβουλίων.
For Philopoemen was well fitted by nature for military services, both in body and in soul, while the other was suited for political deliberations.
§24.11.3τῇ δʼ αἱρέσει κατὰ τὴν πολιτείαν τοῦτο διέφερον ἀλλήλων.
And they differed from one another in their political policy in this way.
τῆς γὰρ Ῥωμαίων ὑπεροχῆς ἤδη τοῖς Ἑλληνικοῖς πράγμασιν ἐμπλεκομένης ὁλοσχερῶς κατά τε τοὺς Φιλιππικοὺς καὶ τοὺς Ἀντιοχικοὺς καιρούς, §24.11.4ὁ μὲν Ἀρίσταινος ἦγε τὴν ἀγωγὴν τῆς πολιτείας οὕτως ὥστε πᾶν τὸ πρόσφορον Ῥωμαίοις ἐξ ἑτοίμου ποιεῖν, ἔνια δὲ καὶ πρὶν ἢ προστάξαι ʼκείνους.
For when the supremacy of the Romans had already become completely entangled with Greek affairs during the times of Philip and Antiochus, Aristaenus, on the one hand, conducted the administration of the state in such a way as to do readily everything that was advantageous to the Romans, and some things even before they ordered them.
§24.11.5ἐπειρᾶτο μέντοι γε τῶν νόμων ἔχεσθαι δοκεῖν καὶ τὴν τοιαύτην ἐφείλκετο φαντασίαν, εἴκων, ὁπότε τούτων ἀντιπίπτοι τις προδήλως τοῖς ὑπὸ Ῥωμαίων γραφομένοις.
Nevertheless, he endeavored to seem to hold to the laws and maintained such an appearance, yielding whenever any of these laws conflicted openly with the decrees written by the Romans.
§24.11.6ὁ δὲ Φιλοποίμην, ὅσα μὲν εἴη τῶν παρακαλουμένων ἀκόλουθα τοῖς νόμοις καὶ τῇ συμμαχίᾳ, πάντα συγκατῄνει καὶ συνέπραττεν ἀπροφασίστως, §24.11.7ὅσα δὲ τούτων ἐκτὸς ἐπιτάττοιεν, οὐχ οἷός τʼ ἦν ἐθελοντὴν συνυπακούειν, ἀλλὰ τὰς μὲν ἀρχὰς ἔφη δεῖν δικαιολογεῖσθαι, μετὰ δὲ ταῦτα πάλιν ἀξιοῦν· §24.11.8εἰ δὲ μηδʼ οὕτως πείθοιεν, τέλος οἷον ἐπιμαρτυρομένους εἴκειν καὶ τότε ποιεῖν τὸ παραγγελλόμενον. —
Philopoemen, on the other hand, consented to and co-operated without hesitation in everything requested that was in accordance with the laws and the alliance; but whatever they ordered outside of these, he was not able to obey voluntarily, but said that at first they ought to plead their rights, and after that to make a request again; and if they could not persuade them even so, finally to yield as if calling witnesses to attest it, and then to do what was commanded. —