§16.14.1ὅτι φησὶ Πολύβιος ἐπεὶ δέ τινες τῶν τὰς κατὰ μέρος γραφόντων πράξεις γεγράφασι καὶ περὶ τούτων τῶν καιρῶν, ἐν οἷς τά τε κατὰ Μεσσηνίους καὶ τὰ κατὰ τὰς προειρημένας ναυμαχίας συνετελέσθη, βούλομαι βραχέα περὶ αὐτῶν διαλεχθῆναι.
Polybius says that since some of those who write history in detail have also written about these times, in which the affairs of the Messenians and the aforementioned naval battles were accomplished, I wish to speak briefly about them.
§16.14.2ποιήσομαι δʼ οὐ πρὸς ἅπαντας, ἀλλʼ ὅσους ὑπολαμβάνω μνήμης ἀξίους εἶναι καὶ διαστολῆς· εἰσὶ δʼ οὗτοι Ζήνων καὶ Ἀντισθένης οἱ Ῥόδιοι.
I shall do so not in regard to all of them, but only to those whom I consider worthy of memory and distinction; and these are Zeno and Antisthenes, the Rhodians.
§16.14.3τούτους δʼ ἀξίους εἶναι κρίνω διὰ πλείους αἰτίας.
I judge them to be worthy for several reasons.
καὶ γὰρ κατὰ τοὺς καιροὺς γεγόνασι καὶ προσέτι πεπολίτευνται καὶ καθόλου πεποίηνται τὴν πραγματείαν οὐκ ὠφελείας χάριν, ἀλλὰ δόξης καὶ τοῦ καθήκοντος ἀνδράσι πολιτικοῖς.
For they lived during these times, and furthermore were engaged in public affairs, and on the whole composed their work not for the sake of profit, but for glory and the duty fitting for statesmen.
§16.14.4τῷ δὲ τὰς αὐτὰς γράφειν ἡμῖν πράξεις ἀναγκαῖόν ἐστι μὴ παρασιωπᾶν, ἵνα μὴ τῷ τῆς πατρίδος ὀνόματι καὶ τῷ δοκεῖν οἰκειοτάτας εἶναι Ῥοδίοις τὰς κατὰ θάλατταν πράξεις, ἡμῶν ἀντιδοξούντων πρὸς αὐτοὺς ἐνίοτε, μᾶλλον ἐπακολουθήσωσιν ἐκείνοις ἤπερ ἡμῖν οἱ φιλομαθοῦντες.
Since they write the same events as we do, it is necessary for us not to remain silent, lest, because of the name of their fatherland and because naval affairs seem most familiar to the Rhodians, when we sometimes hold opinions contrary to theirs, those who are eager to learn should follow them rather than us.
§16.14.5οὗτοι τοιγαροῦν ἀμφότεροι πρῶτον μὲν τὴν περὶ Λάδην ναυμαχίαν οὐχ ἥττω τῆς περὶ Χίον, ἀλλʼ ἐνεργεστέραν καὶ παραβολωτέραν ἀποφαίνουσι καὶ τῇ κατὰ μέρος τοῦ κινδύνου χρείᾳ καὶ συντελείᾳ καὶ καθόλου φασὶ τὸ νίκημα γεγονέναι κατὰ τοὺς Ῥοδίους.
These two, therefore, first of all declare that the naval battle around Lade was not inferior to that of Chios, but more active and adventurous, and they say that on the whole, in terms of the danger and the outcome of the individual actions, the victory belonged to the Rhodians.
§16.14.6ἐγὼ δὲ διότι μὲν δεῖ ῥοπὰς διδόναι ταῖς αὑτῶν πατρίσι τοὺς συγγραφέας, συγχωρήσαιμʼ ἄν, οὐ μὴν τὰς ἐναντίας τοῖς συμβεβηκόσιν ἀποφάσεις ποιεῖσθαι περὶ αὐτῶν.
For my part, I might concede that writers should give some weight to their own fatherlands, but certainly not make assertions contrary to what actually happened concerning them.
§16.14.7ἱκανὰ γὰρ τὰ κατʼ ἄγνοιαν γινόμενα τοῖς γράφουσιν, ἃ διαφυγεῖν ἄνθρωπον δυσχερές· §16.14.8ἐὰν δὲ κατὰ προαίρεσιν ψευδογραφῶμεν ἢ πατρίδος ἕνεκεν ἢ φίλων [ἢ] χάριτος, τί διοίσομεν τῶν ἀπὸ τούτου τὸν βίον ποριζομένων;
For the errors made through ignorance are sufficient for writers, which it is difficult for a human being to escape; but if we write falsehoods deliberately, either for the sake of our country, or friends, or out of favor, how shall we differ from those who make their living from this?
§16.14.9ὥσπερ γὰρ ἐκεῖνοι τῷ λυσιτελεῖ μετροῦντες ἀδοκίμους ποιοῦσι τὰς αὑτῶν συντάξεις, οὕτως οἱ πολιτικοὶ τῷ μισεῖν ἢ τῷ φιλεῖν ἑλκόμενοι πολλάκις εἰς ταὐτὸ τέλος ἐμπίπτουσι τοῖς προειρημένοις.
For just as those men, by measuring everything by utility, make their own writings of no repute, so statesmen, dragged away by hatred or affection, often fall into the same end as the aforementioned.
§16.14.10διὸ δεῖ καὶ τοῦτο τὸ μέρος ἐπιμελῶς τοὺς μὲν ἀναγινώσκοντας παρατηρεῖν, τοὺς δὲ γράφοντας αὐτοὺς παραφυλάττεσθαι.
Therefore, readers must carefully observe this aspect, and writers themselves must guard against it.