Humanitext Reader

Polybius · The Histories §16.10.1-16.10.4

Philip's Inaction and the Nature of Things

Passage 858 of 1311 · Greek

Summary

Polybius explains why Philip did not sail to Alexandria after the battle of Lade, attributing it to the "nature of things," where people desire the impossible from afar but abandon their plans when confronted with reality.

§16.10.1ὅτι μετὰ τὸ συντελεσθῆναι τὴν περὶ τὴν Λάδην ναυμαχίαν καὶ τοὺς μὲν Ῥοδίους ἐκποδὼν γενέσθαι, τὸν δʼ Ἄτταλον μηδέπω συμμεμιχέναι, δῆλον ὡς ἐξῆν γε τελεῖν τῷ Φιλίππῳ τὸν εἰς τὴν Ἀλεξάνδρειαν πλοῦν.
It is clear that after the conclusion of the naval battle of Lade, when the Rhodians had withdrawn and Attalus had not yet joined forces, it was open to Philip to make his voyage to Alexandria.
ἐξ οὗ δὴ καὶ μάλιστʼ ἄν τις καταμάθοι τὸ μανιώδη γενόμενον Φίλιππον τοῦτο πρᾶξαι.
It is from this indeed that one might best understand that Philip, having lost his senses, did this.
— τί οὖν ἦν τὸ τῆς ὁρμῆς ἐπιλαβόμενον;
What was it, then, that checked his impulse?
§16.10.2οὐδὲν ἕτερον ἀλλʼ ἡ φύσις τῶν πραγμάτων.
Nothing other than the very nature of things.
§16.10.3ἐκ πολλοῦ μὲν γὰρ ἐνίοτε πολλοὶ τῶν ἀδυνάτων ἐφίενται διὰ τὸ μέγεθος τῶν προφαινομένων ἐλπίδων, κρατούσης τῆς ἐπιθυμίας τῶν ἑκάστου λογισμῶν·
For sometimes, from a distance, many desire the impossible owing to the greatness of the hopes that present themselves, their desire ruling over the reason of each.
§16.10.4ὅταν δʼ ἐγγίσωσι τοῖς ἔργοις, οὐδενὶ λόγῳ πάλιν ἀφίστανται τῶν προθέσεων, ἐπισκοτούμενοι καὶ παραλογιζόμενοι τοῖς λογισμοῖς διὰ τὴν ἀμηχανίαν καὶ τὴν δυσχρηστίαν τῶν ἀπαντωμένων. —
But when they draw near to the actual deeds, they abandon their purposes again without any rational cause, being blinded and deceived in their calculations because of the difficulty and embarrassment of what confronts them.

Notes

  1. 16.10.1μετὰ τὸ συντελεσθῆναι τὴν περὶ τὴν Λάδην ναυμαχίαν καὶ τοὺς μὲν Ῥοδίους ἐκποδὼν γενέσθαι, τὸν δʼ Ἄτταλον μηδέπω συμμεμιχέναι — An articular infinitive construction (tò συντελεσθῆναι) governed by the preposition μετὰ. The two subsequent accusative-with-infinitive clauses (τοὺς μὲν Ῥοδίους ἐκποδὼν γενέσθαι and τὸν δʼ Ἄτταλον μηδέπω συμμεμιχέναι) are also governed in parallel by μετὰ τό, with their respective subjects expressed in the accusative case, forming a series of temporal conditions.
  2. 16.10.3κρατούσης τῆς ἐπιθυμίας τῶν ἑκάστου λογισμῶν — A genitive absolute construction consisting of the participle κρατούσης and the noun τῆς ἐπιθυμίας as its logical subject, conveying a causal sense. Since the verb κρατέω (to rule, prevail over) governs the genitive case, its object "the calculations/reason of each" is expressed in the genitive (τῶν ἑκάστου λογισμῶν).
  3. 16.10.4ἐπισκοτούμενοι καὶ παραλογιζόμενοι τοῖς λογισμοῖς — The dative τοῖς λογισμοῖς depends on the passive/middle participles ἐπισκοτούμενοι (being blinded/obscured) and παραλογιζόμενοι (being deceived/making miscalculations). This dative expresses the instrument/cause or the sphere of respect, meaning 'being blinded and deceived in their own calculations or by their own reasoning.'

Cite this passage

Polybius, The Histories §16.10.1-16.10.4. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0543.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:16.10.1-16.10.4

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.