§12.28b.1ζώντων ὑπέλαβε τοῦτο παρατηρήσειν.
he supposed that no one of those living would notice this.
οὐ μὴν ἀλλὰ βουλόμενος αὔξειν τὴν ἱστορίαν πρῶτον μὲν τηλικαύτην εἶναί φησι διαφορὰν τῆς ἱστορίας πρὸς τοὺς ἐπιδεικτικοὺς λόγους, ἡλίκην ἔχει τὰ κατʼ ἀλήθειαν ᾠκοδομημένα καὶ κατεσκευασμένα τῶν ἐν ταῖς σκηνογραφίαις φαινομένων τόπων καὶ διαθέσεων· §12.28b.2δεύτερον αὐτὸ τὸ συναθροῖσαί φησι τὴν παρασκευὴν τὴν πρὸς τὴν ἱστορίαν μεῖζον ἔργον εἶναι τῆς ὅλης πραγματείας τῆς περὶ τοὺς ἐπιδεικτικοὺς λόγους· §12.28b.3αὐτὸς γοῦν τηλικαύτην ὑπομεμενηκέναι δαπάνην καὶ κακοπάθειαν τοῦ συναγαγεῖν τὰ παρὰ Κυρνίων ὑπομνήματα καὶ πολυπραγμονῆσαι τὰ Λιγύων ἔθη καὶ Κελτῶν, ἅμα δὲ τούτοις Ἰβήρων, ὥστε μήτʼ ἂν αὐτὸς ἐλπίσαι μήτʼ ἂν ἑτέρους ἐξηγουμένους πιστευθῆναι περὶ τούτων. §12.28b.4ἡδέως δέ τις ἂν ἔροιτο τὸν συγγραφέα πότερον ὑπολαμβάνει μείζονος δεῖσθαι δαπάνης καὶ κακοπαθείας τὸ καθήμενον ἐν ἄστει συνάγειν ὑπομνήματα καὶ πολυπραγμονεῖν τὰ Λιγύων ἔθη καὶ Κελτῶν ἢ τὸ πειραθῆναι τῶν πλείστων ἐθνῶν καὶ τόπων αὐτόπτην γενέσθαι. §12.28b.5τί δʼ αὖ τὸ πυνθάνεσθαι τὰς παρατάξεις καὶ πολιορκίας, ἔτι δὲ ναυμαχίας, τῶν παρατετυχηκότων τοῖς κινδύνοις, ἢ τὸ πεῖραν λαβεῖν τῶν δεινῶν καὶ τῶν ἅμα τούτοις συμβαινόντων ἐπʼ αὐτῶν τῶν ἔργων; §12.28b.6ἐγὼ μὲν γὰρ οὐκ οἴομαι τηλικαύτην διαφορὰν ἔχειν τὰ κατʼ ἀλήθειαν οἰκοδομήματα τῶν ἐν ταῖς σκηνογραφίαις τόπων, οὐδὲ τὴν ἱστορίαν τῶν ἐπιδεικτικῶν λόγων, ἡλίκην ἐπὶ πασῶν τῶν συντάξεων τὴν ἐξ αὐτουργίας καὶ τὴν ἐξ αὐτοπαθείας ἀπόφασιν τῶν ἐξ ἀκοῆς καὶ διηγήματος γραφομένων· §12.28b.7ἧς εἰς τέλος ἄπειρος ὢν εἰκότως ὑπέλαβε τὸ πάντων ἐλάχιστον καὶ ῥᾷστον εἶναι μέγιστον καὶ χαλεπώτατον τοῖς πραγματευομένοις τὴν ἱστορίαν, λέγω δὲ τὸ συνάγειν ὑπομνήματα καὶ πυνθάνεσθαι παρὰ τῶν εἰδότων ἕκαστα τῶν πραγμάτων. §12.28b.8καίτοι γε περὶ τοῦτο τὸ μέρος ἀνάγκη μεγάλα διαψεύδεσθαι τοὺς ἀπείρους· πῶς γὰρ οἷόν τε καλῶς ἀνακρῖναι περὶ παρατάξεως ἢ πολιορκίας ἢ ναυμαχίας;
Nevertheless, wishing to magnify history, he says, first, that there is as great a difference between history and epideictic speeches as there is between buildings actually erected and decorated, and the places and arrangements seen in scene-paintings; secondly, he says that the very collection of the materials necessary for history is a greater task than the whole undertaking of epideictic speeches; at least he himself, he says, has endured such expense and hardship in collecting the records from the Cyrnians and in investigating the customs of the Ligurians and Celts, and along with them the Iberians, that he could neither expect it himself nor would others be believed if they explained it. But one would gladly ask the historian whether he supposes that collecting records and investigating the customs of the Ligurians and Celts while sitting in a city requires greater expense and hardship than attempting to become an eyewitness of most of the nations and places; and again, whether inquiring about battles and sieges, and furthermore sea-fights, from those who happened to be present at the dangers, or gaining personal experience of the terrors and the accompanying events in the actual operations themselves, is more so? For my part, I do not think that the difference between actual buildings and scene-paintings, or between history and epideictic speeches, is as great as the difference, in all historical works, between the account based on personal activity and direct experience, and that written from hearsay and reports; and since Timaeus was completely inexperienced in this, he naturally supposed that what is the smallest and easiest of all things is the greatest and most difficult for those who treat history—I mean, collecting records and inquiring of those who know each of the events. And yet, concerning this part, those who are inexperienced must inevitably make great errors; for how is it possible to question properly about a battle, a siege, or a sea-fight?
πῶς δὲ συνεῖναι τῶν ἐξηγουμένων τὰ κατὰ μέρος ἀνεννόητον ὄντα τῶν προειρημένων; §12.28b.9οὐ γὰρ ἔλαττον ὁ πυνθανόμενος τῶν ἀπαγγελλόντων συμβάλλεται πρὸς τὴν ἐξήγησιν· ἡ γὰρ τῶν παρεπομένων τοῖς πράγμασιν ὑπόμνησις αὐτὴ χειραγωγεῖ τὸν ἐξηγούμενον ἐφʼ ἕκαστα τῶν συμβεβηκότων· §12.28b.10ὑπὲρ ὧν ὁ μὲν ἄπειρος οὔτʼ ἀνακρῖναι τοὺς παραγεγονότας ἱκανός ἐστιν οὔτε συμπαρὼν γνῶναι τὸ γινόμενον, ἀλλὰ κἂν παρῇ, τρόπον τινὰ παρὼν οὐ πάρεστιν.
And how can one who has no understanding of the aforementioned matters comprehend the details told by those explaining them? For the inquirer contributes no less than the reporters to the explanation; for the very recalling of the circumstances accompanying the events guides the narrator to each of the occurrences; concerning which, the inexperienced man is neither capable of questioning those who were present, nor of understanding what is happening even if he is on the spot; indeed, even if he is present, in a way, being present, he is not present.