Humanitext Reader

Polybius · The Histories §12.16.1-12.16.14

Dispute on Zaleucus's Law and Cosmopolis's Ruling

Passage 756 of 1311 · Greek

Summary

The story of a dispute between two young men regarding the interpretation of Zaleucus's law in Locris, and its witty resolution by the elderly Cosmopolis.

§12.16.1νεανίσκων δυεῖν περί τινος οἰκέτου διαφερομένων συνέβαινε παρὰ μὲν τὸν ἕτερον καὶ πλείω χρόνον γεγονέναι τὸν παῖδα, §12.16.2τὸν δʼ ἕτερον ἡμέραις δυσὶ πρότερον εἰς τὸν ἀγρὸν ἐλθόντα μὴ παρόντος τοῦ δεσπότου μετὰ βίας εἰς οἶκον ἀπηχέναι τὸν δοῦλον,
It happened that, while two young men were disputing over a certain servant, the boy had been with the one for a longer time, and the other, having come to the field two days earlier when the master was not present, had led the slave away by force to his own house.
§12.16.3κἄπειτα τὸν ἕτερον αἰσθόμενον ἐλθεῖν ἐπὶ τὴν οἰκίαν, καὶ λαβόντʼ ἀπάγειν ἐπὶ τὴν ἀρχήν, καὶ φάναι δεῖν κύριον αὐτὸν εἶναι διδόντα τοὺς ἐγγυητάς· §12.16.4κελεύειν γὰρ τὸν Ζαλεύκου νόμον τοῦτον δεῖν κρατεῖν τῶν ἀμφισβητουμένων ἕως τῆς κρίσεως παρʼ οὗ τὴν ἀγωγὴν συμβαίνει γίνεσθαι.
And then, the former, having realized this, went to the house, and taking him, led him away to the magistrates, and said that he himself ought to have custody of him by offering guarantors; for he said that the law of Zaleucus commanded that, until the trial, the disputed property must remain in the possession of the one from whom the seizure happened to have been made.
§12.16.5τοῦ δʼ ἑτέρου κατὰ τὸν αὐτὸν νόμον παρʼ αὑτοῦ φάσκοντος γεγονέναι τὴν ἀγωγήν — ἐκ γὰρ τῆς οἰκίας τῆς ἐκείνου τὸ σῶμα πρὸς τὴν ἀρχὴν ἥκειν ἀπαγόμενον — §12.16.6τοὺς προκαθημένους ἄρχοντας διαποροῦντας ὑπὲρ τοῦ πράγματος ἐπισπάσασθαι καὶ συμμεταδοῦναι τῷ κοσμοπόλιδι.
But when the other, according to the same law, claimed that the seizure had been made from himself—for the person had come to the magistrates being led away from his own house— the presiding magistrates, being in doubt about the matter, called in the Cosmopolis and shared the difficulty with him.
§12.16.7τὸν δὲ διαστείλασθαι τὸν νόμον, φήσαντα παρὰ τούτων τὴν ἀγωγὴν αἰεὶ γίνεσθαι, παρʼ οἷς ἂν ἔσχατον ἀδήριτον ᾖ χρόνον τινὰ γεγονὸς τὸ διαμφισβητούμενον· §12.16.8ἐὰν δέ τις ἀφελόμενος βίᾳ παρά τινος ἀπαγάγῃ πρὸς αὑτόν, κἄπειτα παρὰ τούτου τὴν ἀγωγὴν ὁ προϋπάρχων ποιῆται δεσπότης, οὐκ εἶναι ταύτην κυρίαν.
And he interpreted the law, saying that the seizure is always deemed to have been made from those in whose possession the disputed property has last been for some time without dispute; but if someone, having taken it away by force from another, leads it to his own place, and then the original owner makes a seizure from him, this latter seizure is not valid.
§12.16.9τοῦ δὲ νεανίσκου δεινοπαθοῦντος καὶ μὴ φάσκοντος εἶναι τοῦ νομοθέτου ταύτην τὴν προαίρεσιν, προκαλέσασθαί φασι τὸν κοσμόπολιν, εἴ τι βούλεται λέγειν ὑπὲρ τῆς γνώμης κατὰ τὸν Ζαλεύκου νόμον.
And when the young man was indignant and claimed that this was not the intention of the legislator, they say that the Cosmopolis challenged him, if he wished to say anything concerning the meaning of the law, to do so according to the law of Zaleucus.
§12.16.10τοῦτο δʼ ἐστὶ καθισάντων τῶν χιλίων καὶ βρόχων κρεμασθέντων λέγειν ὑπὲρ τῆς τοῦ νομοθέτου γνώμης· §12.16.11ὁπότερος δʼ ἂν αὐτῶν φανῇ τὴν προαίρεσιν ἐπὶ τὸ χεῖρον ἐκδεχόμενος, τὸν τοιοῦτον διὰ τῆς ἀγχόνης ἀπόλλυσθαι βλεπόντων τῶν χιλίων.
And this is to speak on behalf of the intention of the legislator with the Thousand seated and nooses hanging; and whichever of them appears to have understood the intention in the worse sense, this man is put to death by hanging while the Thousand look on.
§12.16.12ταῦτα προτείναντος τοῦ κοσμοπόλιδος, τὸν νεανίσκον εἰπεῖν φασιν ἄνισον εἶναι τὴν συνθήκην· τῷ μὲν γὰρ ἔτη δύʼ ἢ τρία καταλείπεσθαι τοῦ ζῆν· §12.16.13συνέβαινε γὰρ εἶναι τὸν κοσμόπολιν οὐ πολὺ λεῖπον τῶν ἐνενήκοντʼ ἐτῶν· αὑτῷ δὲ τοῦ βίου τὸ πλεῖον ἐκ τῶν εὐλόγων ἔτι μένειν.
When the Cosmopolis proposed this, they say that the young man said the agreement was unequal; for to the one, only two or three years of life were left— for it happened that the Cosmopolis was not much short of ninety years of age—but to himself, the greater part of life still remained according to reasonable expectation.
§12.16.14ὁ μὲν οὖν νεανίσκος οὕτως εὐτραπελευσάμενος ἐξέλυσε τὴν σπουδήν, οἱ δʼ ἄρχοντες ἔκριναν τὴν ἀγωγὴν κατὰ τὴν τοῦ κοσμοπόλιδος γνώμην.
Thus the young man, by playing the wit, dissolved the seriousness of the situation, and the magistrates decided the seizure according to the opinion of the Cosmopolis.

Notes

  1. 12.16.4τὴν ἀγωγὴν — Here, ἀγωγή refers to the physical 'carrying off' or 'seizure' of a person (the slave), rather than the initiation of a lawsuit. The law of Zaleucus stipulates that temporary custody pending trial belongs to the party from whom the object was seized, and the interpretation of this clause is the central point of dispute.
  2. 12.16.7ἀδήριτον — An adjective meaning 'uncontested' or 'without dispute.' The Cosmopolis interprets the law (διαστείλασθαι) to mean that the criterion for temporary custody should not simply be the location immediately prior to the forceful removal, but where the property was last held peacefully and without dispute.
  3. 12.16.10βρόχων κρεμασθέντων — A genitive absolute construction. It describes the harsh practice under Zaleucus's law, where anyone who lost a debate regarding the modification or interpretation of a law was immediately hanged on the spot.

Cite this passage

Polybius, The Histories §12.16.1-12.16.14. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0543.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:12.16.1-12.16.14

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.