Humanitext Reader

Pausanias · Description of Greece §9.13.1-9.13.5

Early Life of Epaminondas and Portents at Leuctra

Passage 378 of 465 · Greek

Summary

The passage describes the youth and education of the Theban general Epaminondas, his firm stance in negotiations with Sparta, and the ominous divine signs before the Battle of Leuctra, along with the tragic story of Scedasus' daughters who were violated by Spartans.

§9.13.1τῷ δʼ Ἐπαμινώνδᾳ τὰ μὲν τῶν προγόνων ὑπῆρχεν ἐς γένους δόξαν, ὁ δέ οἱ πατὴρ χρημάτων ἕνεκα μέσου ἀνδρὸς ἀπέδει Θηβαίου·
Now to Epaminondas, his ancestral heritage was sufficient for the glory of his house, but his father, in respect of money, fell short of an average Theban.
διδάγματα δὲ αὐτοῖς τά τε ἐπιχώρια ἔμαθεν ἐς τὸ ἀκριβέστατον καὶ ὡς ἤδη μειράκιον ἦν ἐφοίτησεν ὡς Λῦσιν, ἄνδρα γένος μὲν Ταραντῖνον, ἐπιστάμενον δὲ τοὺς Πυθαγόρου τοῦ Σαμίου λόγους.
Of their subjects of instruction, he learned the local ones with the utmost accuracy, and when he was already a youth, he attended the lectures of Lysis, a man by birth of Tarentum, who was well versed in the doctrines of Pythagoras of Samos.
λέγεται δὲ ὁ Ἐπαμινώνδας, ἡνίκα ἐπολέμουν Λακεδαιμόνιοι Μαντινεῦσι, πεμφθῆναι σὺν ἄλλοις ἀνδράσιν ἐκ Θηβῶν Λακεδαιμονίοις ἐπαμύνειν· ἔχοντα δὲ τραύματα ἐν τῇ μάχῃ Πελοπίδαν ἐξέσωσεν ἐς ἅπαν ἀφικόμενος κινδύνου.
It is said that Epaminondas, when the Lacedaemonians were at war with the Mantineans, was sent from Thebes with other men to help the Lacedaemonians; and in the battle he saved Pelopidas, who had received wounds, by exposing himself to the utmost danger.
§9.13.2χρόνῳ δὲ ὕστερον κατὰ πρεσβείαν ἐς Σπάρτην ἥκοντα Ἐπαμινώνδαν, ὅτε Λακεδαιμόνιοι συντίθεσθαι τοῖς Ἕλλησιν ἔφασαν εἰρήνην τὴν ἐπὶ Ἀνταλκίδου καλουμένην, τηνικαῦτα Ἐπαμινώνδαν ἤρετο Ἀγησίλαος, εἰ κατὰ πόλιν ὀμνύναι Βοιωτοὺς ἐάσουσιν ὑπὲρ τῆς εἰρήνης·
At a later time, when Epaminondas had come as an envoy to Sparta, when the Lacedaemonians said they were making the peace with the Greeks called the Peace of Antalcidas, then Agesilaus asked Epaminondas whether they would allow the Boeotians to swear to the peace city by city.
“οὐ πρότερόν γε” εἶπεν “ὦ Σπαρτιᾶται, πρὶν ἢ καὶ τοὺς περιοίκους ὀμνύοντας κατὰ πόλιν ἴδωμεν τοὺς ὑμετέρουσ”. §9.13.3ὡς δὲ ὁ Λακεδαιμονίων καὶ Θηβαίων ἐξῆρτο ἤδη πόλεμος καὶ οἱ Λακεδαιμόνιοι δυνάμει καὶ αὑτῶν καὶ τῶν συμμάχων ἐπὶ τοὺς Θηβαίους ᾔεσαν, Ἐπαμινώνδας μὲν ἔχων τοῦ στρατοῦ μοῖραν ἀντεκάθητο ὑπὲρ τῆς Κηφισίδος λίμνης ὡς ποιησομένων ταύτῃ Πελοποννησίων τὴν ἐσβολήν, Κλεόμβροτος δὲ ὁ Λακεδαιμονίων βασιλεὺς ἐπὶ Ἀμβρόσσου τρέπεται τῆς Φωκέων· ἀποκτείνας δὲ Χαιρέαν, ὃς φυλάσσειν διετέτακτο τὰς παρόδους, καὶ ἄλλους τοὺς σὺν αὐτῷ Θηβαίους, ὑπερέβη καὶ ἐς Λεῦκτρα ἀφικνεῖται τὰ Βοιώτια.
"Not before, Spartans," said he, "we see your perioikoi also swearing city by city." When the war between the Lacedaemonians and the Thebans had already broken out, and the Lacedaemonians with the force of both themselves and their allies were marching against the Thebans, Epaminondas, holding a portion of the army, lay encamped opposite them beyond the Cephisian lake, on the assumption that the Peloponnesians would make their invasion by this way; but Cleombrotus, the king of the Lacedaemonians, turned towards Ambrossus in Phocis, and having killed Chaereas, who had been stationed to guard the passes, and the other Thebans with him, he crossed over and arrived at Leuctra in Boeotia.
§9.13.4ἐνταῦθα καὶ αὐτῷ Κλεομβρότῳ καὶ Λακεδαιμονίων τῷ κοινῷ σημεῖα ἐγένετο ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ.
There, both to Cleombrotus himself and to the common state of the Lacedaemonians, signs came from the god.
τοῖς βασιλεῦσιν αὐτῶν ἐς τὰς ἐξόδους πρόβατα εἵπετο θεοῖς τε εἶναι θυσίας καὶ πρὸ τῶν ἀγώνων καλλιερεῖν· ταῖς δὲ ποίμναις ἡγεμόνες τῆς πορείας ἦσαν αἶγες, κατοιάδας οἱ ποιμένες ὀνομάζουσιν αὐτάς.
For their kings on their expeditions were followed by sheep to be sacrifices to the gods and to obtain good omens before battles; and as leaders of the way for the flocks there were goats, which the shepherds call katoiades.
τότε οὖν ὁρμήσαντες ἐς τὴν ποίμνην λύκοι τοῖς μὲν προβάτοις ἐγίνοντο οὐδὲν βλάβος, οἱ δὲ τὰς αἶγας τὰς κατοιάδας ἔκτεινον.
On this occasion, then, wolves rushed upon the flock and did no harm to the sheep, but killed the goats that were the leaders.
§9.13.5ἐλέγετο δὲ καὶ μήνιμα ἐς τοὺς Λακεδαιμονίους ἐκ τῶν θυγατέρων εἶναι τῶν Σκεδάσου.
It was also said that there was wrath against the Lacedaemonians arising from the daughters of Scedasus.
Σκεδάσῳ γὰρ περὶ Λεῦκτρα οἰκοῦντι θυγατέρες Μολπία γίνεται καὶ Ἱππώ· ταύτας ἐς ὥραν ἤδη προηκούσας Λακεδαιμονίων ἄνδρες βιάζονται παρὰ θέμιδα Φρουραρχίδας καὶ Παρθένιος.
For to Scedasus, who lived near Leuctra, daughters were born, Molpia and Hippo; when these had already reached a marriageable age, Lacedaemonian men, Phrurarchidas and Parthenius, violated them contrary to law.
καὶ αἵ τε παρθένοι παραυτίκα—οὐ γάρ σφισιν ἀνεκτὰ ἐφαίνετο εἶναι τὰ τῆς ὕβρεως—ἀπάγχουσιν αὑτάς· καὶ ὁ Σκέδασος, ὡς ἐς Λακεδαίμονα ἐλθόντι οὐδεμία ἐγένετο αὐτῷ δίκη, οὕτως ἐς τὰ Λεῦκτρα ἐπανήκων αὑτὸν διεργάζεται.
And the maidens immediately—for the outrage seemed to them not to be endured—hanged themselves; and Scedasus, since no justice was done for him when he went to Lacedaemon, thus returned to Leuctra and made away with himself.

Notes

  1. 9.13.2ἥκοντα Ἐπαμινώνδαν... τηνικαῦτα Ἐπαμινώνδαν ἤρετο — The accusative 'ἥκοντα Ἐπαμινώνδαν' at the beginning of the sentence is repeated as 'Ἐπαμινώνδαν' as the direct object of 'ἤρετο' in the main clause. This redundant repetition (anacoluthon-like) is caused by the insertion of the long 'ὅτε' clause.
  2. 9.13.3ὡς ποιησομένων ταύτῃ Πελοποννησίων τὴν ἐσβολήν — A genitive absolute construction with the conjunction 'ὡς' (ποιησομένων ... Πελοποννησίων). The future participle indicates a subjective expectation or intention ("on the assumption that they would make...").
  3. 9.13.4θεοῖς τε εἶναι θυσίας — The infinitive 'εἶναι' expresses purpose, modifying 'εἵπετο' (followed) to mean 'to be sacrifices to the gods'.
  4. 9.13.5θυγατέρες Μολπία γίνεται καὶ Ἱππώ — Although the subject is plural ('θυγατέρες ... Μολπία ... καὶ Ἱππώ'), the verb is in the third-person singular ('γίνεται'). This is an example of irregular grammatical agreement (akin to Schema Pindaricum or Schema Boeoticum), which often occurs when the plural subjects are listed individually after the verb.

Cite this passage

Pausanias, Description of Greece §9.13.1-9.13.5. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0525.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:9.13.1-9.13.5

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.