Humanitext Reader

Strabo · Geography §1.1.7-1.1.8

Proof of the Surrounding Ocean and the Inhabited World as an Island

Passage 3 of 577 · Greek

Summary

Strabo cites Homeric verses to demonstrate that the ocean surrounds the earth, discussing the poet's understanding of tides and Crates' interpretation of the ocean's parts. Furthermore, he proves that the inhabited world is an island surrounded by the ocean, using empirical observation, rational deduction, and the uniformity of tidal phenomena.

§1.1.7καὶ ἄλλως δʼ ἐμφαίνει τὸ κύκλῳ περικεῖσθαι τῇ γῇ τὸν ὠκεανόν, ὅταν οὕτω φῇ ἡ Ἥρα εἶμι γὰρ ὀψομένη πολυφόρβου πείρατα γαίης Ὠκεανόν τε θεῶν γένεσιν. τοῖς γὰρ πέρασι πᾶσι συνήθη λέγει τὸν ὠκεανόν, τὰ δὲ πέρατα κύκλῳ περίκειται.
And in another way also he indicates that the ocean surrounds the earth in a circle, when he represents Hera as saying: "For I am going to see the limits of the fertile earth, and Oceanus, the origin of the gods." For he says that the ocean is adjacent to all the "limits," and the limits lie around in a circle.
ἔν τε τῇ ὁπλοποιίᾳ τῆς Ἀχιλλέως ἀσπίδος κύκλῳ περιτίθησι τὸν ὠκεανὸν ἐπὶ τῆς ἴτυος.
Also, in the making of the armor of Achilles, he places the ocean in a circle on the rim of the shield.
ἔχεται δὲ τῆς αὐτῆς φιλοπραγμοσύνης καὶ τὸ μὴ ἀγνοεῖν τὰ περὶ τὰς πλημμυρίδας τοῦ ὠκεανοῦ καὶ τὰς ἀμπώτεις ἀψορρόου ὠκεανοῖο, λέγοντα καί τρὶς μὲν γάρ τʼ ἀνίησιν ἐπʼ ἤματι, τρὶς δʼ ἀναροιβδεῖ. καὶ γὰρ εἰ μὴ τρὶς ἀλλὰ δίς, τάχα τῆς ἱστορίας παραπεσόντος ἢ τῆς γραφῆς διημαρτημένης, ἀλλʼ ἥ γε προαίρεσις τοιαύτη.
It also belongs to the same scientific interest that he is not ignorant of the phenomena of the tides of the ocean, both the ebb and flow, calling it "backward-flowing Oceanus," and also saying: "For three times in a day she sends it up, and three times she gulps it down." For even if it is not three times but twice (perhaps because the historical fact was lost or the text was corrupted), yet his intention at least is of this kind.
καὶ τὸ ἐξ ἀκαλαρρείταο δὲ ἔχει τινὰ ἔμφασιν τῆς πλημμυρίδος, ἐχούσης τὴν ἐπίβασιν πραεῖαν καὶ οὐ τελέως ῥοώδη.
And the phrase "from the gently-flowing" also contains some indication of the tide, since it has a gentle onset and is not completely torrential.
Ποσειδώνιος δὲ καὶ ἐκ τοῦ σκοπέλους λέγειν τοτὲ μὲν καλυπτομένους τοτὲ δὲ γυμνουμένους καὶ ἐκ τοῦ ποταμὸν φάναι τὸν ὠκεανὸν εἰκάζει τὸ ῥοῶδες αὐτοῦ τὸ περὶ τὰς πλημμυρίδας ἐμφανίζεσθαι.
Posidonius says that from his saying that the reefs are at one time covered and at another time bare, and from his calling the ocean a river, he infers that its flowing character regarding the tides is indicated.
τὸ μὲν οὖν πρῶτον εὖ, τὸ δὲ δεύτερον οὐκ ἔχει λόγον· οὔτε γὰρ ποταμίῳ ῥεύματι ἔοικεν ἡ τῆς πλημμυρίδος ἐπίβασις, πολὺ δὲ μᾶλλον ἡ ἀναχώρησις οὐ τοιαύτη, ὅ τε τοῦ Κράτητος λόγος διδάσκει τι πιθανώτερον.
Now, the first point is good, but the second has no reason; for the onset of the tide does not resemble a river current, and much more the retreat is not of such a kind, and the argument of Crates teaches something more plausible.
βαθύρρουν μὲν γὰρ καὶ ἄψορρον λέγει, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ ποταμὸν τὸν ὅλον ὠκεανόν· λέγει δὲ καὶ μέρος τοῦ ὠκεανοῦ τι ποταμὸν καὶ ποταμοῖο ῥόον, οὐ τοῦ ὅλου ἀλλὰ τοῦ μέρους, ὅταν οὕτω φῇ αὐτὰρ ἐπεὶ ποταμοῖο λίπεν ῥόον ὠκεανοῖο νηῦς, ἀπὸ δʼ ἵκετο κῦμα θαλάσσης εὐρυπόροιο. οὐ γὰρ τὸν ὅλον, ἀλλὰ τὸν ἐν τῷ ὠκεανῷ τοῦ ποταμοῦ ῥόον μέρος ὄντα τοῦ ὠκεανοῦ, ὅν φησιν ὁ Κράτης ἀνάχυσίν τινα καὶ κόλπον ἐπὶ τὸν νότιον πόλον ἀπὸ τοῦ χειμερινοῦ τροπικοῦ διήκοντα.
For he calls the whole ocean "deep-flowing" and "backward-flowing," and likewise a "river"; but he also calls some part of the ocean a "river" and the "flow of a river," not of the whole but of the part, when he says: "But when the ship left the flow of the river Oceanus, and came to the wave of the wide-wayed sea." For he does not mean the whole, but the "flow of the river in the ocean," which is a part of the ocean, which Crates says is an overflow and a gulf extending from the winter tropic towards the south pole.
τοῦτον γὰρ δύναιτʼ ἄν τις ἐκλιπὼν ἔτι εἶναι ἐν τῷ ὠκεανῷ, τὸν δὲ ὅλον ἐκλιπόντα ἔτι εἶναι ἐν τῷ ὅλῳ οὐχ οἷόν τε.
For one could leave this and still be in the ocean, but it is impossible for one who has left the whole to still be in the whole.
Ὅμηρος δέ γε οὕτω φησί ποταμοῖο λίπεν ῥόον, ἀπὸ δʼ ἵκετο κῦμα θαλάσσης, ἥτις οὐκ ἄλλη τίς ἐστιν ἀλλὰ ὠκεανός.
Yet Homer says: "left the flow of the river, and came to the wave of the sea," which is none other than the ocean.
γίνεται οὖν, ἐὰν ἄλλως δέχῃ, ἐκβὰς ἐκ τοῦ ὠκεανοῦ ἦλθεν εἰς τὸν ὠκεανόν.
It follows, then, if you accept the other view, that having gone out of the ocean he came into the ocean.
ἀλλὰ ταῦτα μὲν μακροτέρας ἐστὶ διαίτης.
But these matters belong to a longer discussion.
§1.1.8̔́οτι δὲ ἡ οἰκουμένη νῆσός ἐστι πρῶτον μὲν ἐκ τῆς αἰσθήσεως καὶ τῆς πείρας ληπτέον.
On the other hand, that the inhabited world is an island must be grasped first from sensation and experience.
πανταχῆ γάρ, ὁπουποτοῦν ἐφικτὸν γέγονεν ἀνθρώποις ἐπὶ τὰ ἔσχατα τῆς γῆς προελθεῖν, εὑρίσκεται θάλαττα, ἣν δὴ καλοῦμεν ὠκεανόν.
For everywhere, wherever it has been possible for men to advance to the limits of the earth, the sea is found, which we indeed call the ocean.
καὶ ὅπου δὲ τῇ αἰσθήσει λαβεῖν οὐχ ὑπῆρξεν, ὁ λόγος δείκνυσι.
And where it was not possible to grasp it by sensation, reason demonstrates it.
τὸ μὲν γὰρ ἑωθινὸν πλευρόν, τὸ κατὰ τοὺς Ἰνδούς, καὶ τὸ ἑσπέριον, τὸ κατὰ τοὺς Ἴβηρας καὶ τοὺς Μαυρουσίους, περιπλεῖται πᾶν ἐπὶ πολὺ τοῦ τε νοτίου μέρους καὶ τοῦ βορείου·
For the eastern side, that of the Indians, and the western side, that of the Iberians and the Maurusians, are entirely sailed around for a great distance both on the southern side and the northern.
τὸ δὲ λειπόμενον ἄπλουν ἡμῖν μέχρι νῦν τῷ μὴ συμμῖξαι μηδένας ἀλλήλοις τῶν ἀντιπεριπλεόντων οὐ πολύ, εἴ τις συντίθησιν ἐκ τῶν παραλλήλων διαστημάτων τῶν ἐφικτῶν ἡμῖν.
And the remaining part, which has been unnavigable for us until now because no persons sailing from opposite directions have met each other, is not great, if one estimates it from the parallel distances accessible to us.
οὐκ εἰκὸς δὲ διθάλαττον εἶναι τὸ πέλαγος τὸ Ἀτλαντικόν, ἰσθμοῖς διειργόμενον οὕτω στενοῖς τοῖς κωλύουσι τὸν περίπλουν, ἀλλὰ μᾶλλον σύρρουν καὶ συνεχές· οἵ τε γὰρ περιπλεῖν ἐγχειρήσαντες, εἶτα ἀναστρέψαντες, οὐχ ὑπὸ ἠπείρου τινὸς ἀντιπιπτούσης καὶ κωλυούσης τὸν ἐπέκεινα πλοῦν ἀνακρουσθῆναι φασίν, ἀλλὰ ὑπὸ ἀπορίας καὶ ἐρημίας, οὐδὲν ἧττον τῆς θαλάττης ἐχούσης τὸν πόρον.
And it is not likely that the Atlantic Sea is divided into two seas, separated by isthmuses so narrow as to prevent the circumnavigation, but rather that it is confluent and continuous; for those who attempted to sail around and then turned back say that they were not driven back by any opposing continent that blocked their further voyage, but by want and solitude, although the sea offered a passage no less.
τοῖς τε πάθεσι τοῦ ὠκεανοῦ τοῖς περὶ τὰς ἀμπώτεις καὶ τὰς πλημμυρίδας ὁμολογεῖ τοῦτο μᾶλλον· πάντη γοῦν ὁ αὐτὸς τρόπος τῶν τε μεταβολῶν ὑπάρχει καὶ τῶν αὐξήσεων καὶ μειώσεων, ἣ οὐ πολὺ παραλλάττων, ὡς ἂν ἐπὶ ἑνὸς πελάγους τῆς κινήσεως ἀποδιδομένης καὶ ἀπὸ μιᾶς αἰτίας.
And this agrees more with the phenomena of the ocean regarding the ebb and flow; at any rate, the manner of the changes and of the increases and decreases is everywhere the same, or does not differ much, as if the movement were performed on a single sea and from a single cause.

Notes

  1. 1.1.7ἔχεται δὲ τῆς αὐτῆς φιλοπραγμοσύνης — The middle verb ἔχομαι governs the genitive τῆς αὐτῆς φιλοπραγμοσύνης, meaning "to belong to" or "to be closely connected with." The subject is the following articular infinitive clause τὸ μὴ ἀγνοεῖν...
  2. 1.1.7τῆς ἱστορίας παραπεσόντος ἢ τῆς γραφῆς διημαρτημένης — Two genitive absolute constructions are placed in disjunction. The subject of the first is either omitted or takes τῆς ἱστορίας as its subject, meaning "the factual information being lost/deviated." The second means "the text being corrupted," both expressing an adverbial nuance of concession or cause.
  3. 1.1.8τὸ δὲ λειπόμενον ἄπλουν ἡμῖν μέχρι νῦν τῷ μὴ συμμῖξαι μηδένας ἀλλήλοις τῶν ἀντιπεριπλεόντων οὐ πολύ — The main backbone of the sentence is the copulative structure τὸ δὲ λειπόμενον... οὐ πολύ [ἐστι] ("the remaining part is not great"). The articular infinitive phrase in the dative, τῷ μὴ συμμῖξαι..., expresses cause: "because of the fact that (those sailing in opposite directions) have not met each other."
  4. 1.1.8ὡς ἂν ἐπὶ ἑνὸς πελάγους τῆς κινήσεως ἀποδιδομένης καὶ ἀπὸ μιᾶς αἰτίας — The particle combination ὡς ἄν is followed by the genitive absolute construction τῆς κινήσεως ἀποδιδομένης, introducing a hypothetical or metaphorical assumption ("as if the movement were performed on a single sea and from a single cause").

Cite this passage

Strabo, Geography §1.1.7-1.1.8. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0099.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:1.1.7-1.1.8

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.