§63d.1Fr. 63d
Λέγει Ἀριστοτέλης ὅτι ἐν ταῖς τοιαύταις προτάοσεσιν αἱ δυνάμει τοὺς τρεῖς ὅρους ἐν ἑαυταῖς ἔχουσιν, ὁποῖαί εἰσιν οὓς ἐξέθετο νῦν, ὁποῖαί εἰσιν αἱ κατὰ πρόσληψιν ὑπὸ Θεοφράστου λεγόμεναι·
Aristotle says that in such propositions they implicitly contain the three terms within themselves, which are of the kind he has just set out, of the kind called "propositions by proslepsis" by Theophrastus.
αὗται γὰρ τοὺς τρεῖς ὅρους ἔχουσί πως· ἐν γὰρ τῇ καθʼ οὖ τὸ Β παντὸς κατʼ ἐκείνου καὶ τὸ Α παντὸς, ἐν τοῖς δύο ὅροις, τῷ τε Β καὶ τῷ Α, τοῖς ὡρισμένοις ἤδη πως περιείληπται καὶ ὁ τρίτος, καθʼ οὗ τὸ Β κατηγορεῖται, πλὴν οὐχ ὁμοίως ἐκείνοις ὡρισμένος φανερός.
For these contain the three terms in a certain way: for in the proposition "of whatever B is predicated of all, of that A is also predicated of all", within the two terms, namely B and A, which are already in a certain way determined, the third term, of which B is predicated, is also enclosed, except that it is not clearly determined and manifest in the same way as those.
Ἐν δὴ ταῖς τοιαύταις προτάσεσι αἱ τῇ λέξει μόνον τῶν κατηγορικῶν διαφέρειν δοκοῦσιν, ὡς ἔδειξεν ἐν τῷ περὶ Καταφάσεως Θ ὁ μέντοι Θ. ἐν τῷ περὶ Καταφάσεως τὴν καθʼ οὗ τὸ Β, τὸ Α, ὡς ἴσον δυναμένην λαμβάνει τῇ καθʼ οὖ παντὸς τὸ Β, κατʼ ἐκείνου παντὸς τὸ Α.
Indeed, in such propositions they seem to differ from categorical propositions only in expression, as Theophrastus showed in *On Affirmation*. However, Theophrastus in *On Affirmation* takes the proposition "to that of which B is, A is" as having equal force to "of whatever B is predicated of all, of that A is also predicated of all".