§22.1Fr. 22
Καὶ Θ. ἐν τοῖς Φυσικοῖς φαίνεται τὴν ἐννοίαν ταύε την ἐσχηκὼς περὶ τοῦ τόπου ἐν οἷς φησὶν ὡς ἐν ἀπορίᾳ προάγων τὸν λόγον μήποτε οὐκ ἔστι καθʼ αὑτὴν οὐσία τις ὁ τόπος ἀλλὰ τῇ τάξει καὶ θέσει τῶν σωμάτων λέγεται κατὰ τὰς φύσεις καὶ δυνάμεις· ὁμοίως δ' ἐπὶ ζώων καὶ φυτῶν καὶ ὅλως τῶν ἀνομοιομερῶν, εἴτε ἐμψύχων εἴτε ἀψύχων, ἔμμορφον δὲ τὴν φύσιν ἐχόντων· καὶ γὰρ τούτων τάξις τις καὶ θέσις τῶν μερῶν ἐστὶ πρὸς τὴν ὅλην οὐσίαν.
Fr. 22 And Theophrastus also in his *Physics* seems to have held this view concerning place, in which he says, advancing the argument by way of difficulty: "Could it be that place is not some substance in itself, but is spoken of in terms of the order and position of bodies, according to their natures and powers?" And similarly in the case of animals and plants, and generally of heterogeneous things, whether animate or inanimate, provided they have a formed nature; for of these too there is a certain order and position of the parts in relation to the whole substance.
Διὸ καὶ ἕκαστον ἐν αὑτοῦ χώρᾳ λέγεται τῷ ἔχειν τὴν οἰκείαν τάξιν· ἐπεὶ καὶ τῶν τοῦ σώματος μερῶν ἕκαστον ἐπιποθήσειεν ἂν καὶ ἀπαιτήσειε τὴν ἑαυτοῦ χώραν καὶ θέσιν.
Therefore, each of them is also said to be in its own place by virtue of having its proper order; since indeed each of the parts of the body would yearn for and demand its own place and position.