Humanitext Reader

Aristotle · Politics §5.1311a

Differences of Kingship and Tyranny and Motives for Attacks

Passage 103 of 155 · Greek

Summary

This chunk illustrates the differences between kingship and tyranny regarding their goals and guards, showing how tyranny combines the evils of both oligarchy and democracy. It further discusses the motives for attacks and conspiracies against monarchs, highlighting how personal insults lead to revenge, exemplified by Harmodius and Periander of Ambracia.

§5.1311aὅπως οἱ μὲν κεκτημένοι τὰς οὐσίας μηθὲν ἄδικον πάσχωσιν, ὁ δὲ δῆμος μὴ ὑβρίζηται μηθέν·
so that those who possess property may suffer no wrong, and the people may suffer no insolence.
ἡ δὲ τυραννίς, ὥσπερ εἴρηται πολλάκις, πρὸς οὐδὲν ἀποβλέπει κοινόν, εἰ μὴ τῆς ἰδίας ὠφελείας χάριν.
But tyranny, as has been said many times, looks to no common good, except for the sake of its own benefit.
ἔστι δὲ σκοπὸς τυραννικὸς μὲν τὸ ἡδύ, βασιλικὸς δὲ τὸ καλόν.
And the tyrannical goal is the pleasant, while the kingly is the noble.
διὸ καὶ τῶν πλεονεκτημάτων τὰ μὲν χρήματα τυραννικὰ, τὰ δʼ εἰς τιμὴν βασιλικὰ μᾶλλον· καὶ φυλακὴ βασιλικὴ μὲν πολιτική, τυραννικὴ δὲ διὰ ξένων.
Therefore, of advantages, wealth is tyrannical, while things concerning honor are rather kingly; and the kingly guard is citizenly, while the tyrannical is through foreigners.
ὅτι δʼ ἡ τυραννὶς ἔχει κακὰ καὶ τὰ τῆς δημοκρατίας καὶ τὰ τῆς ὀλιγαρχίας, φανερόν· ἐκ μὲν ὀλιγαρχίας τὸ τὸ τέλος εἶναι πλοῦτον (οὕτω γὰρ καὶ διαμένειν ἀναγκαῖον μόνως τήν τε φυλακὴν καὶ τὴν τρυφήν), καὶ τὸ τῷ πλήθει μηδὲν πιστεύειν (διὸ καὶ τὴν παραίρεσιν ποιοῦνται τῶν ὅπλων), καὶ τὸ κακοῦν τὸν ὄχλον καὶ τὸ ἐκ τοῦ ἄστεως ἀπελαύνειν καὶ διοικίζειν ἀμφοτέρων κοινόν, καὶ τῆς ὀλιγαρχίας καὶ τῆς τυραννίδος· ἐκ δημοκρατίας δὲ τὸ πολεμεῖν τοῖς γνωρίμοις καὶ διαφθείρειν λάθρᾳ καὶ φανερῶς καὶ φυγαδεύειν ὡς ἀντιτέχνους καὶ πρὸς τὴν ἀρχὴν ἐμποδίους.
And that tyranny has the evils of both democracy and oligarchy is clear: from oligarchy that the end is wealth (for thus only is it necessary that both the guard and luxury continue), and trusting the multitude in nothing (wherefore they also make the confiscation of weapons), and abusing the crowd and driving them out of the city and dispersing them, which is common to both, oligarchy and tyranny; and from democracy fighting against the notables and destroying them secretly and openly and exiling them as rivals and obstacles to the rule.
ἐκ γὰρ τούτων συμβαίνει γίγνεσθαι καὶ τὰς ἐπιβουλάς, τῶν μὲν ἄρχειν αὐτῶν βουλομένων, τῶν δὲ μὴ δουλεύειν.
For from these things it happens that conspiracies also arise, some wishing to rule themselves, others not to be enslaved.
ὅθεν καὶ τὸ Περιάνδρου πρὸς Θρασύβουλον συμβούλευμά ἐστιν, ἡ τῶν ὑπερεχόντων σταχύων κόλουσις, ὡς δέον αἰεὶ τοὺς ὑπερέχοντας τῶν πολιτῶν ἀναιρεῖν.
Whence also is the advice of Periander to Thrasybulus, the cutting off of the outstanding ears of corn, as meaning that one should always eliminate the outstanding citizens.
καθάπερ οὖν σχεδὸν ἐλέχθη, τὰς αὐτὰς ἀρχὰς δεῖ νομίζειν περί τε τὰς πολιτείας εἶναι τῶν μεταβολῶν καὶ περὶ τὰς μοναρχίας· διά τε γὰρ ἀδικίαν καὶ διὰ φόβον καὶ διὰ καταφρόνησιν ἐπιτίθενται πολλοὶ τῶν ἀρχομένων ταῖς μοναρχίαις, τῆς δὲ ἀδικίας μάλιστα διʼ ὕβριν, ἐνίοτε δὲ καὶ διὰ τὴν τῶν ἰδίων στέρησιν.
Therefore, just as was almost said, one must think that the same principles of change exist about constitutions as about monarchies; for because of injustice and fear and contempt, many of the subjects attack monarchies, and of injustice, especially because of insolence, and sometimes also because of the deprivation of private property.
ἔστι δὲ καὶ τὰ τέλη ταὐτά, καθάπερ κἀκεῖ, καὶ περὶ τὰς τυραννίδας καὶ τὰς βασιλείας· μέγεθος γὰρ ὑπάρχει πλούτου καὶ τιμῆς τοῖς μονάρχοις, ὧν ἐφίενται πάντες.
And the targets are also the same, just as there, both about tyrannies and kingships; for there exists a greatness of wealth and honor for monarchs, which all men desire.
τῶν δʼ ἐπιθέσεων αἱ μὲν ἐπὶ τὸ σῶμα γίγνονται τῶν ἀρχόντων, αἱ δʼ ἐπὶ τὴν ἀρχήν.
And of the attacks, some are made against the body of the rulers, others against the rule.
αἱ μὲν οὖν διʼ ὕβριν ἐπὶ τὸ σῶμα.
Those because of insolence are against the body.
τῆς δʼ ὕβρεως οὔσης πολυμεροῦς, ἕκαστον αὐτῶν αἴτιον γίγνεται τῆς ὀργῆς· τῶν δʼ ὀργιζομένων σχεδὸν οἱ πλεῖστοι τιμωρίας χάριν ἐπιτίθενται, ἀλλʼ οὐχ ὑπεροχῆς.
And since insolence has many parts, each of them becomes a cause of anger; and of those who are angry, almost most attack for the sake of revenge, but not for superiority.
οἷον ἡ μὲν τῶν Πεισιστρατιδῶν διὰ τὸ προπηλακίσαι μὲν τὴν Ἁρμοδίου ἀδελφὴν ἐπηρεάσαι δʼ Ἁρμόδιον (ὁ μὲν γὰρ Ἁρμόδιος διὰ τὴν ἀδελφήν, ὁ δὲ Ἀριστογείτων διὰ τὸν Ἁρμόδιον), ἐπεβούλευσαν δὲ καὶ Περιάνδρῳ τῷ ἐν Ἀμβρακίᾳ τυράννῳ διὰ τὸ συμπίνοντα μετὰ τῶν παιδικῶν ἐρωτῆσαι αὐτὸν εἰ ἤδη ἐξ αὐτοῦ κύει·
For example, the attack on the Pisistratidae was because they insulted the sister of Harmodius and abused Harmodius (for Harmodius did so because of his sister, and Aristogeiton because of Harmodius); and they also plotted against Periander the tyrant in Ambracia because, when drinking with his favorite, he asked him if he was already pregnant by him.

Notes

  1. 1311aὅπως — A clause introduced by `ὅπως`, functioning either as a purpose clause or an object clause explaining the role of the guardian (`φύλαξ`) mentioned at the end of the previous chunk.
  2. 1311aἐκ μὲν ὀλιγαρχίας — This phrase introduces several accusative-and-infinitive phrases (`τὸ... εἶναι` etc.) as its logical complements. A verb like 'derives' or 'inherits' is syntactically implied.
  3. 1311aτῶν μὲν ἄρχειν αὐτῶν βουλομένων, τῶν δὲ μὴ δουλεύειν — A genitive absolute construction explaining the reasons for or the parties involved in the conspiracies (`τὰς ἐπιβουλάς`). `τῶν μέν` and `τῶν δέ` refer to two distinct groups of conspirators.
  4. 1311aὡς δέον — An accusative absolute construction using the neuter participle of the impersonal verb `δεῖ`, expressing an objective necessity or duty ('as being necessary to...').
  5. 1311aτῆς δʼ ὕβρεως οὔσης πολυμεροῦς — A genitive absolute construction functioning causally or circumstantially, explaining why each form of insolence can provoke anger.

Cite this passage

Aristotle, Politics §5.1311a. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.humanitext-grc2:5.1311a

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.