Humanitext Reader

Aristotle · Politics §5.1305b

Internal Causes of Revolution in Oligarchies

Passage 96 of 155 · Greek

Summary

The passage details the various internal causes of changes in oligarchies, including revolutions led by wealthy citizens excluded from office, demagoguery arising within the ruling body or directed at the populace, and the actions of profligate elites who have depleted their private fortunes.

§5.1305bἔχει δὲ καὶ ἡ ἐξ ἄλλων ἀρχὴ στάσεως διαφοράς.
But the beginning of faction that arises from others also has differences.
ὁτὲ μὲν γὰρ ἐξ αὐτῶν τῶν εὐπόρων, οὐ τῶν ὄντων δʼ ἐν ταῖς ἀρχαῖς, γίγνεται κατάλυσις, ὅταν ὀλίγοι σφόδρα ὦσιν οἱ ἐν ταῖς τιμαῖς, οἷον ἐν Μασσαλίᾳ καὶ ἐν Ἴστρῳ καὶ ἐν Ἡρακλείᾳ καὶ ἐν ἄλλαις πόλεσι συμβέβηκεν· οἱ γὰρ μὴ μετέχοντες τῶν ἀρχῶν ἐκίνουν, ἕως μετέλαβον οἱ πρεσβύτεροι πρότερον τῶν ἀδελφῶν, ὕστερον δʼ οἱ νεώτεροι πάλιν· οὐ γὰρ ἄρχουσιν ἐνιαχοῦ μὲν ἅμα πατήρ τε καὶ υἱός, ἐνιαχοῦ δὲ ὁ πρεσβύτερος καὶ ὁ νεώτερος ἀδελφός· καὶ ἔνθα μὲν πολιτικωτέρα ἐγένετο ἡ ὀλιγαρχία, ἐν Ἴστρῳ δʼ εἰς δῆμον ἀπετελεύτησεν, ἐν Ἡρακλείᾳ δʼ ἐξ ἐλαττόνων εἰς ἑξακοσίους ἦλθεν·
For sometimes, an overthrow occurs from the wealthy themselves indeed, but those not being in office, whenever those in honors are extremely few, just as has happened in Massalia and in Istros and in Heraclea and in other cities; for those not participating in the offices kept stirring up revolution, until first the elder of the brothers, and later again the younger, obtained a share; for in some places father and son do not rule together, and in others the elder and the younger brother; and in some places the oligarchy became more constitutional, while in Istros it ended in democracy, and in Heraclea it went from fewer men to six hundred.
μετέβαλε δὲ καὶ ἐν Κνίδῳ ἡ ὀλιγαρχία στασιασάντων τῶν γνωρίμων αὐτῶν πρὸς αὑτοὺς διὰ τὸ ὀλίγους μετέχειν καί, καθάπερ εἴρηται, εἰ πατήρ, υἱὸν μὴ μετέχειν, μηδʼ εἰ πλείους ἀδελφοί, ἀλλʼ ἢ τὸν πρεσβύτατον· ἐπιλαβόμενος γὰρ στασιαζόντων ὁ δῆμος, καὶ λαβὼν προστάτην ἐκ τῶν γνωρίμων, ἐπιθέμενος ἐκράτησεν, ἀσθενὲς γὰρ τὸ στασιάζον·
And the oligarchy changed also in Cnidus, when the notables themselves fell into faction against one another because few participated and, as has been said, if a father [participated], his son did not, nor if there were several brothers, did any but the eldest; for the people, taking advantage of them while they were in faction, and having taken a leader from the notables, made an attack and prevailed; for that which is in faction is weak.
καὶ ἐν Ἐρυθραῖς δὲ ἐπὶ τῆς τῶν Βασιλιδῶν ὀλιγαρχίας ἐν τοῖς ἀρχαίοις χρόνοις, καίπερ καλῶς ἐπιμελομένων τῶν ἐν τῇ πολιτείᾳ, ὅμως διὰ τὸ ὑπʼ ὀλίγων ἄρχεσθαι ἀγανακτῶν ὁ δῆμος μετέβαλε τὴν πολιτείαν.
And in Erythrae also, in ancient times, during the oligarchy of the Basilidae, although those in the government took care of affairs well, nevertheless the people, being indignant because of being ruled by few, changed the constitution.
κινοῦνται δʼ αἱ ὀλιγαρχίαι ἐξ αὑτῶν καὶ διὰ φιλονεικίαν δημαγωγούντων (ἡ δημαγωγία δὲ διττή, ἡ μὲν ἐν αὐτοῖς τοῖς ὀλίγοις—ἐγγίγνεται γὰρ δημαγωγὸς κἂν πάνυ ὀλίγοι ὦσιν, οἷον ἐν τοῖς Τριάκοντα Ἀθήνησιν οἱ περὶ Χαρικλέα ἴσχυσαν τοὺς Τριάκοντα δημαγωγοῦντες, καὶ ἐν τοῖς Τετρακοσίοις οἱ περὶ Φρύνιχον τὸν αὐτὸν τρόπον— ἡ δʼ ὅταν τὸν ὄχλον δημαγωγῶσιν οἱ ἐν τῇ ὀλιγαρχίᾳ ὄντες, οἷον ἐν Λαρίσῃ οἱ πολιτοφύλακες διὰ τὸ αἱρεῖσθαι αὐτοὺς τὸν ὄχλον ἐδημαγώγουν, καὶ ἐν ὅσαις ὀλιγαρχίαις οὐχ οὗτοι αἱροῦνται τὰς ἀρχὰς ἐξ ὧν οἱ ἄρχοντές εἰσιν, ἀλλʼ αἱ μὲν ἀρχαὶ ἐκ τιμημάτων μεγάλων εἰσὶν ἢ ἑταιριῶν, αἱροῦνται δʼ οἱ ὁπλῖται ἢ ὁ δῆμος, ὅπερ ἐν Ἀβύδῳ συνέβαινεν, καὶ ὅπου τὰ δικαστήρια μὴ ἐκ τοῦ πολιτεύματός ἐστι—δημαγωγοῦντες γὰρ πρὸς τὰς κρίσεις μεταβάλλουσι τὴν πολιτείαν, ὅπερ καὶ ἐν Ἡρακλείᾳ ἐγένετο τῇ ἐν τῷ Πόντῳ—ἔτι δʼ ὅταν ἔνιοι εἰς ἐλάττους ἕλκωσι τὴν ὀλιγαρχίαν· οἱ γὰρ τὸ ἴσον ζητοῦντες ἀναγκάζονται βοηθὸν ἐπαγαγέσθαι τὸν δῆμον).
And oligarchies are set in motion from within themselves also because of the rivalry of those who play the demagogue. And demagoguery is of two kinds: one within the oligarchs themselves—for a demagogue arises even if they are very few, just as in the case of the Thirty at Athens those around Charicles grew powerful by playing the demagogue to the Thirty, and in the case of the Four Hundred those around Phrynichus did in the same manner—and the other is when those in the oligarchy play the demagogue to the multitude, just as in Larisa the citizen-guards, because they were elected by the multitude, played the demagogue to them, and in all those oligarchies where those from whom the rulers come do not elect the offices, but the offices indeed come from large property qualifications or political clubs, but the hoplites or the people elect them, which was what happened in Abydus, and where the courts are not from the ruling body—for by playing the demagogue with a view to judgments they change the constitution, which also happened in Heraclea in Pontus—and furthermore, whenever some draw the oligarchy to fewer members; for those who seek equality are forced to call in the people as an ally.
γίνονται δὲ μεταβολαὶ τῆς ὀλιγαρχίας καὶ ὅταν ἀναλώσωσι τὰ ἴδια ζῶντες ἀσελγῶς· καὶ γὰρ οἱ τοιοῦτοι καινοτομεῖν ζητοῦσι, καὶ ἢ τυραννίδι ἐπιτίθενται αὐτοὶ ἢ κατασκευάζουσιν ἕτερον
And changes of oligarchy also occur when they waste their own property by living dissolutely; for such men seek to make innovations, and either they themselves attack to establish tyranny, or

Notes

  1. 1305bἔχει δὲ καὶ ἡ ἐξ ἄλλων ἀρχὴ στάσεως διαφοράς — The prepositional phrase 'ἐξ ἄλλων' refers to 'other people' (i.e., those wealthy citizens excluded from office) rather than 'from other states,' and 'ἀρχή' is used in the sense of 'origin/beginning' rather than 'ruling office.' This interpretation is supported by the subsequent examples, such as Massalia, where wealthy men not holding office initiated political changes.
  2. 1305bἕως μετέλαβον οἱ πρεσβύτεροι πρότερον τῶν ἀδελφῶν — The genitive 'τῶν ἀδελφῶν' is a partitive genitive depending on the comparative adjective 'οἱ πρεσβύτεροι', meaning 'the elder of the brothers'. The verb 'μετέλαβον' takes an implied object 'τῶν ἀρχῶν' (the offices) from the preceding clause.
  3. 1305bἡ δὲ διττή, ἡ μὲν ἐν αὐτοῖς τοῖς ὀλίγοις... ἡ δʼ ὅταν τὸν ὄχλον δημαγωγῶσιν — This is a dual contrast marked by 'ἡ μὲν... ἡ δʼ...'. It is structurally asymmetrical: 'ἡ μὲν' is followed by a prepositional phrase ('among the oligarchs themselves'), while 'ἡ δʼ' is followed by a temporal clause ('when they play the demagogue to the multitude'). Both serve as predicate explanations describing the two forms of demagoguery.
  4. 1305bδιὰ τὸ αἱρεῖσθαι αὐτοὺς τὸν ὄχλον — In the articular infinitive clause 'τὸ αἱρεῖσθαι', 'τὸν ὄχλον' (accusative) functions as the subject, while 'αὐτούς' (accusative, referring to the citizen-guards) is the object. The infinitive 'αἱρεῖσθαι' is parsed as a middle voice with an active sense ('to elect'), meaning 'because the multitude elected them.'

Cite this passage

Aristotle, Politics §5.1305b. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.humanitext-grc2:5.1305b

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.